Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 10, 2023·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Seattle Kraken 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA171728422
BUF17110118335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:56BUFAlex TuchAssists: Tage Thompson, Jeff Skinner · Snap, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:52SEAJordan EberlePPAssists: Andre Burakovsky · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:12BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Dylan Cozens · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:59SEAYanni GourdeAssists: Justin Schultz, Oliver Bjorkstrand · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:06SEAMatty BeniersAssists: Vince Dunn, Andre Burakovsky · Poke, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:17SEAJustin SchultzGWGAssists: Matty Beniers, Jordan Eberle · Slap, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:38BUFAlex TuchAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 16:38SEACarson Soucy: Holding2 min
  2. P1 18:45BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:57SEAJordan Eberle: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 5:07SEAAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:09SEABrandon Tanev: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 18:09BUFJeff Skinner: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 14:15SEAYanni Gourde: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← SEA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Krebs
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEABUF
22Shots on goal35
3.0Expected goals3.7
36Shot attempts63
36Faceoffs won29
1Power plays4
10Penalty minutes4
21Hits16
13Blocked shots4
1Giveaways4
8Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestGourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen10:30

    xG 0.45–0.07 (86%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Sprong – Tanev – Geekie5:45

    xG 0.43–0.23 (66%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Burakovsky – Beniers9:43

    xG 0.77–0.78 (50%)attempts 8–9goals 2–0

  4. Schwartz – Wennberg – McCann9:01

    xG 0.34–0.57 (37%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Oleksiak13:52

    xG 0.96–0.50 (66%)attempts 13–13goals 2–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn18:11

    xG 0.73–0.72 (51%)attempts 10–16goals 1–1

  3. Soucy – Borgen11:58

    xG 0.85–0.89 (49%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Tuch – Thompson11:36

    xG 0.92–0.29 (76%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Olofsson – Jost – Mittelstadt10:04

    xG 0.57–0.37 (61%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs8:24

    xG 0.32–0.57 (36%)attempts 7–7goals 0–2

  4. Hinostroza – Asplund – Cozens9:30

    xG 0.40–0.80 (33%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Dahlin2:11

    xG 0.51–0.01 (98%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Clague – Lyubushkin7:38

    xG 0.67–0.40 (63%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  3. Dahlin – Power2:14

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.7 xGSEA 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #607 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).