Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 10, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Vancouver Canucks 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN3100519424
PIT3202709536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:46VANConor GarlandAssists: Quinn Hughes, Luke Schenn · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:40VANBrock BoeserAssists: Bo Horvat, Ilya Mikheyev · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P1 7:05VANQuinn HughesAssists: Luke Schenn, Elias Pettersson · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–0
  4. P1 8:57PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Ty Smith, Bryan Rust · Slap, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P1 14:25PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Bryan Rust · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P1 16:30PITJason ZuckerAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P2 7:58PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–4
  8. P2 14:31PITRickard RakellPPGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Ty Smith · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–5
  9. P3 12:52VANTravis DermottAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Brock Boeser · Backhand, 0.10 xG4–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:53VANCurtis Lazar: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:51VANJ.T. Miller: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 16:59PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:15PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 6:21VANElias Pettersson: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 14:02VANCurtis Lazar: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:32PITDanton Heinen: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 16:56PITBrock McGinn: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:42VANDakota Joshua: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 9:53VANSheldon Dries: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
49% to win51% to win
← VAN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANPIT
24Shots on goal36
2.8Expected goals4.5
47Shot attempts66
20Faceoffs won34
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
20Hits25
17Blocked shots9
6Giveaways9
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Miller – Pettersson – Kuzmenko6:30

    xG 0.51–0.52 (50%)attempts 6–11goals 1–1

  2. Horvat – Boeser – Mikheyev6:43

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  3. Garland – Lockwood – Dries3:05

    xG 0.01–0.25 (2%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

  4. Lazar – Joshua – Studnicka8:14

    xG 0.26–0.51 (33%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Bear2:02

    xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Myers – Dermott3:05

    xG 0.02–0.10 (15%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Dermott – Bear6:40

    xG 0.05–0.29 (14%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel9:01

    xG 0.94–0.11 (89%)attempts 15–5goals 1–1

  2. Malkin – Zucker – Rakell8:09

    xG 0.64–0.46 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  3. Carter – Kapanen – O'Connor5:56

    xG 0.39–0.23 (63%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  4. Blueger – McGinn – Heinen5:50

    xG 0.15–0.27 (36%)attempts 4–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Smith11:07

    xG 1.41–0.11 (93%)attempts 25–5goals 2–0

  2. Ruhwedel – Joseph6:48

    xG 0.30–0.36 (46%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. Dumoulin – Ruhwedel2:20

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.5 xGVAN 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #133 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.75 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).