Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 21, 2023·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

San Jose Sharks 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1151516326
CBJ02212315529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:49SJSTimo MeierAssists: Noah Gregor, Tomas Hertl · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:39SJSNick BoninoAssists: Nico Sturm, Jaycob Megna · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:19CBJJohnny GaudreauPPAssists: Patrik Laine, Nick Blankenburg · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:31CBJBoone JennerAssists: Kent Johnson, Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:53SJSNico SturmUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:04CBJPatrik LaineAssists: Jack Roslovic, Johnny Gaudreau · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:38CBJGustav NyquistGWGAssists: Kent Johnson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:56CBJSean KuralyENAssists: Nick Blankenburg, Andrew Peeke · Wrist, 0.31 xG3–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:41CBJCole Sillinger: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 5:41CBJMathieu Olivier: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 5:41SJSJonah Gadjovich: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 9:47SJSNoah Gregor: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 5:16SJSNoah Gregor: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
49% to win51% to win
← SJS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jenner won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCBJ
26Shots on goal29
3.3Expected goals2.8
38Shot attempts59
27Faceoffs won30
1Power plays2
9Penalty minutes7
15Hits24
13Blocked shots4
1Giveaways4
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Gregor – Sturm8:18

    xG 1.46–0.10 (94%)attempts 8–4goals 2–0

  2. Hertl – Meier – Eyssimont11:44

    xG 0.30–0.40 (43%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  3. Lindblom – Lorentz – Gadjovich9:26

    xG 0.18–0.62 (22%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Couture – Nieto – Barabanov9:05

    xG 0.14–0.62 (19%)attempts 2–12goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrington – Ferraro11:08

    xG 1.40–0.64 (69%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

  2. Karlsson – Ferraro3:16

    xG 0.18–0.04 (81%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Megna14:15

    xG 0.24–0.20 (54%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Roslovic – Laine9:43

    xG 0.50–0.02 (96%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  2. Nyquist – Jenner – Johnson7:45

    xG 0.38–0.11 (77%)attempts 9–4goals 2–0

  3. Kuraly – Olivier – Robinson8:30

    xG 0.13–0.11 (55%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Jenner – Johnson5:01

    xG 0.08–0.06 (58%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Berni15:59

    xG 0.50–0.23 (68%)attempts 14–4goals 1–0

  2. Peeke – Blankenburg8:58

    xG 0.28–0.18 (61%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Gavrikov – Peeke7:51

    xG 0.36–0.28 (56%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.8 xGSJS 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #222 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.00 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).