Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 24, 2023·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Los Angeles Kings 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 65% of the time.

PHI winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
LAK21411101013438
PHI214170901331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:50PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Owen Tippett, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:21LAKAnze KopitarPPAssists: Kevin Fiala, Drew Doughty · Slap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:27PHIWade AllisonAssists: Kevin Hayes, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P1 11:40LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Adrian Kempe, Quinton Byfield · Snap, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:37PHIRasmus RistolainenAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Morgan Frost · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:36LAKSamuel FagemoAssists: Blake Lizotte · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:09LAKKevin FialaGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:31LAKPhillip Danault: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 9:17PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:32PHITravis Sanheim: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 18:14LAKAdrian Kempe: Holding2 min
  5. P2 1:45PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:51PHINicolas Deslauriers: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 15:43PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Boarding2 min
  8. P2 19:20LAKQuinton Byfield: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 0:00PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 0:00LAKMikey Anderson: Roughing2 min
  11. OT 1:09PHITony DeAngelo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. OT 1:09PHITony DeAngelo: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
49% to win51% to win
← LAK attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Danault won the faceoff against Cates
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKPHI
38Shots on goal31
3.3Expected goals2.3
68Shot attempts47
41Faceoffs won21
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes24
13Hits30
9Blocked shots16
3Giveaways6
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – Kempe – Byfield9:58

    xG 0.83–0.05 (95%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Danault – Arvidsson – Iafallo12:06

    xG 0.29–0.40 (42%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Kupari – Fagemo – Turcotte5:12

    xG 0.10–0.25 (28%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  4. Fiala – Anderson-Dolan – Lizotte11:05

    xG 0.62–0.86 (42%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Walker10:43

    xG 0.63–0.27 (70%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  2. Roy – Walker2:15

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Anderson16:40

    xG 0.52–0.56 (48%)attempts 8–13goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Laughton – Allison8:13

    xG 1.08–0.54 (67%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Tippett – Frost7:15

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 3–8goals 2–1

  3. Deslauriers – Brown – MacEwen5:46

    xG 0.10–0.36 (22%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Konecny – Cates – Farabee10:00

    xG 0.06–0.38 (14%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – York15:14

    xG 0.79–0.40 (66%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. DeAngelo – Provorov2:07

    xG 0.18–0.13 (59%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  3. Seeler – Ristolainen10:17

    xG 0.23–0.55 (29%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.3 xGLAK 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHILAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #228 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 65% of the time.

PHI winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).