Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 26, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI1100111801230
MIN07191512323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:14PHINoah CatesAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Deflected, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:39MINMatt BoldyAssists: Marcus Foligno, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P3 4:48MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:32PHITony DeAngeloAssists: Kevin Hayes, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. OT 2:08MINMats ZuccarelloGWGAssists: Calen Addison, Matt Boldy · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 9:56PHINicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 9:56MINRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:11MINMason Shaw: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:11PHIWade Allison: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:12MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 10:12PHIZack MacEwen: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 2:45MINBrandon Duhaime: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 2:45PHIPatrick Brown: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 8:33MINCalen Addison: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 11:25MINKirill Kaprizov: Interference2 min
  11. P2 17:07PHIPatrick Brown: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 1:53MINSam Steel: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 3:09PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min · PPG
  14. P3 12:11PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 12:11MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 12:11PHITravis Konecny: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← PHI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cates won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIMIN
30Shots on goal23
2.4Expected goals3.5
54Shot attempts61
23Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
28Penalty minutes28
19Hits19
21Blocked shots16
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Laughton – Tippett5:21

    xG 0.23–0.04 (86%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Hayes – Laughton – Allison4:34

    xG 0.22–0.25 (47%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Konecny – Cates2:19

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Tippett – Frost8:24

    xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Seeler – Ristolainen11:10

    xG 0.51–0.66 (44%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – DeAngelo12:07

    xG 0.42–0.67 (39%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Provorov – York15:58

    xG 0.41–0.94 (30%)attempts 10–19goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Steel14:08

    xG 1.11–0.56 (67%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

  2. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar3:31

    xG 0.04–0.01 (80%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek8:13

    xG 0.31–0.35 (47%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Duhaime – Boldy5:36

    xG 0.04–0.54 (6%)attempts 2–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMerrill – Addison10:22

    xG 0.72–0.27 (73%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Spurgeon – Middleton15:31

    xG 0.76–0.61 (55%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba15:35

    xG 0.45–0.42 (51%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.5 xGPHI 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #397 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).