Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 13, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Florida Panthers 2, Minnesota Wild 1 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA0181808002234
MIN01011005031128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:06FLAEetu LuostarinenAssists: Gustav Forsling, Nick Cousins · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:15MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Calen Addison · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mats Zuccarello scored
  2. 2. FLA Anton Lundell scored
  3. 3. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  4. 4. FLA Aleksander Barkov scored
  5. 5. MIN Frederick Gaudreau stopped
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:31MINJordan Greenway: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:18FLACarter Verhaeghe: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 11:10MINFrederick Gaudreau: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 16:07FLAGustav Forsling: Interference2 min
  5. P2 8:12MINMatt Boldy: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 9:18FLABrandon Montour: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 11:59FLASam Reinhart: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 15:04MINJonas Brodin: Interference2 min
  9. P3 1:04MINJonas Brodin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 2:21MINJon Merrill: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 7:25MINJordan Greenway: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 10:25FLARadko Gudas: Holding the stick2 min
  13. P3 16:01MINJordan Greenway: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 16:01FLAAaron Ekblad: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← FLA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Lundell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAMIN
34Shots on goal28
3.3Expected goals3.0
72Shot attempts58
25Faceoffs won33
7Power plays5
12Penalty minutes16
14Hits10
14Blocked shots22
5Giveaways7
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk7:43

    xG 0.69–0.33 (68%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

  2. Cousins – Lomberg – Luostarinen5:37

    xG 0.41–0.39 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

  3. Staal – Smith – Denisenko3:12

    xG 0.02–0.10 (19%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Barkov – Reinhart – Lundell7:54

    xG 0.00–0.44 (0%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Mahura5:37

    xG 0.42–0.02 (95%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Montour8:19

    xG 0.53–0.16 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Forsling2:11

    xG 0.04–0.01 (77%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov4:26

    xG 0.29–0.12 (71%)attempts 6–4goals 1–1

  2. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar3:36

    xG 0.13–0.00 (96%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson Ek – Duhaime – Boldy5:22

    xG 0.12–0.21 (36%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Gaudreau – Greenway3:29

    xG 0.06–0.22 (21%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Middleton9:54

    xG 0.33–0.17 (66%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  2. Merrill – Addison7:27

    xG 0.32–0.29 (53%)attempts 10–6goals 1–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba10:32

    xG 0.35–0.46 (44%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.0 xGFLA 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #582 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.79 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).