Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 18, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

New Jersey Devils 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 87% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD112216215543
PIT1130919231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:33PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Rickard Rakell, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:53NJDDawson MercerAssists: Nico Hischier, Tomas Tatar · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:47NJDDougie HamiltonPPAssists: Nico Hischier, Jack Hughes · Snap, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:25NJDNico HischierSHGWGAssists: Yegor Sharangovich · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–1
  5. P3 8:39NJDJesper BrattAssists: Jack Hughes, Yegor Sharangovich · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–1
  6. P3 14:43PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Jeff Petry · Snap, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:56NJDNico HischierENAssists: Dawson Mercer · Wrist, 0.79 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:05NJDJohn Marino: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:58NJDBrendan Smith: Interference2 min
  3. P1 11:43NJDRyan Graves: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 13:08PITJeff Carter: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 3:37PITMarcus Pettersson: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:08NJDRyan Graves: Interference2 min
  7. P2 12:14PITJeff Carter: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 3:02NJDKevin Bahl: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
49% to win51% to win
← NJD attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Hischier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDPIT
43Shots on goal31
4.8Expected goals2.1
64Shot attempts61
26Faceoffs won28
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
21Hits29
20Blocked shots10
7Giveaways16
11Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestBratt – Sharangovich – Hughes10:05

    xG 0.68–0.21 (76%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  2. Tatar – Hischier – Mercer11:00

    xG 0.90–0.46 (66%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0

  3. Haula – Palat – Zetterlund11:43

    xG 0.55–0.32 (63%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  4. Wood – McLeod – Boqvist3:05

    xG 0.02–0.11 (18%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeverson – Bahl9:25

    xG 0.59–0.03 (95%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Hamilton12:17

    xG 0.81–0.34 (70%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Graves – Marino17:37

    xG 0.95–0.83 (53%)attempts 22–29goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Malkin – Zucker – Rust8:20

    xG 0.20–0.18 (53%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Archibald – Blueger – McGinn8:31

    xG 0.20–0.24 (45%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rakell – Guentzel13:27

    xG 0.69–0.79 (46%)attempts 23–17goals 0–1

  4. Carter – Kapanen – O'Connor8:38

    xG 0.19–1.02 (16%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin12:31

    xG 0.63–0.25 (72%)attempts 19–11goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Joseph2:05

    xG 0.16–0.01 (96%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Pettersson13:33

    xG 0.62–0.55 (53%)attempts 19–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.1 xGNJD 4.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #701 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 87% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).