Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 20, 2023·FLA Live Arena, Sunrise

Anaheim Ducks 3, Florida Panthers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 79% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA2150111600332
FLA01621412312455

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:46ANAMason McTavishAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Max Jones · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:20ANAFrank VatranoPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, John Klingberg · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:12FLAEric StaalAssists: Radko Gudas · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:23FLAMarc StaalAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Eetu Luostarinen · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:51ANADmitry KulikovAssists: John Klingberg · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:09FLARyan LombergAssists: Gustav Forsling, Nick Cousins · Deflected, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:42FLACarter VerhaegheGWGAssists: Eetu Luostarinen, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:27FLARyan Lomberg: Interference2 min
  2. P1 4:27ANAJohn Klingberg: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 13:50FLAGustav Forsling: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 1:55ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 4:42ANASimon Benoit: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 4:42FLACarter Verhaeghe: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 5:21ANAJohn Klingberg: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 10:27FLAAaron Ekblad: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
49% to win51% to win
← ANA attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAFLA
32Shots on goal55
3.0Expected goals5.2
45Shot attempts94
29Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
8Penalty minutes8
10Hits23
24Blocked shots10
9Giveaways12
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Jones – McTavish10:13

    xG 0.85–0.48 (64%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

  2. Silfverberg – Vatrano – Lundeström9:50

    xG 0.31–0.25 (55%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  3. Carrick – Megna – Comtois6:35

    xG 0.37–0.55 (40%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

  4. Grant – Strome – Zegras10:11

    xG 0.14–1.30 (10%)attempts 8–20goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Fowler13:26

    xG 1.19–0.67 (64%)attempts 14–17goals 1–0

  2. Kulikov – Benoit2:29

    xG 0.00–0.33 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Shattenkirk – Benoit11:27

    xG 0.26–0.92 (22%)attempts 9–19goals 0–2

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Cousins – Lomberg10:57

    xG 1.22–0.22 (85%)attempts 23–7goals 1–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Tkachuk – Luostarinen12:43

    xG 1.11–0.64 (63%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  3. Barkov – Reinhart – Tkachuk2:07

    xG 0.33–0.16 (67%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

  4. White – Smith – Denisenko2:59

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Mahura12:56

    xG 1.01–0.03 (97%)attempts 19–4goals 1–0

  2. Ekblad – Forsling13:46

    xG 1.56–0.94 (63%)attempts 23–13goals 1–0

  3. Montour – Forsling2:51

    xG 0.39–0.25 (61%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 5.2 xGANA 3.0 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #150 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.35 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 79% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).