Fri, Feb 24, 2023·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia
Montréal Canadiens 5, Philadelphia Flyers 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTL | 214 | 16 | 211 | 531 |
| PHI | 06 | 010 | 210 | 226 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 17:50MTLDavid SavardAssists: Mike Hoffman, Jesse Ylonen · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
- P1 19:55MTLChris TierneyAssists: Michael Pezzetta, Johnathan Kovacevic · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
- P2 7:12MTLNick SuzukiPPGWGAssists: Mike Matheson, Mike Hoffman · Tip-in, 0.02 xG3–0
- P3 0:09PHIOwen TippettAssists: Morgan Frost · Snap, 0.03 xG3–1
- P3 6:26MTLJesse YlonenAssists: Justin Barron, Jonathan Drouin · Tip-in, 0.07 xG4–1
- P3 12:12MTLJosh AndersonAssists: Rafael Harvey-Pinard · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–1
- P3 18:32PHIIvan ProvorovAssists: Tony DeAngelo, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–2
Penalties (5)
- P1 7:52PHIOlle Lycksell: Slashing2 min
- P2 6:53MTLAlex Belzile: Fighting5 min
- P2 6:53PHIWade Allison: Instigator2 min · PPG
- P2 6:53PHIWade Allison: Fighting5 min
- P2 6:53PHIWade Allison: Instigator misconduct10 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Frost
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Montréal Canadiens
Forward lines
- bestHoffman – Drouin – Ylonen11:50
xG 0.62–0.47 (57%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0
- Dadonov – Dvorak – Pitlick14:01
xG 0.34–0.25 (58%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1
- Belzile – Tierney – Pezzetta11:15
xG 0.25–0.23 (52%)attempts 6–13goals 1–1
- Anderson – Suzuki – Harvey-Pinard12:50
xG 0.50–0.59 (46%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestSavard – Schueneman13:54
xG 0.81–0.24 (77%)attempts 17–9goals 1–0
- Kovacevic – Schueneman3:51
xG 0.09–0.07 (57%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1
- Savard – Harris2:30
xG 0.06–0.12 (33%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestTippett – Frost – Farabee5:23
xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 2–0
- Deslauriers – Brown – Lycksell2:14
xG 0.11–0.14 (44%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1
- Hayes – Laughton – Cates2:42
xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0
- Cates – Lycksell – Farabee3:20
xG 0.01–0.10 (12%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSanheim – York4:59
xG 0.39–0.00 (99%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0
- Seeler – DeAngelo10:51
xG 0.32–0.26 (55%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0
- Sanheim – Provorov8:49
xG 0.19–0.14 (58%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − MTL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).