Wed, Mar 1, 2023·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia
New York Rangers 3, Philadelphia Flyers 2 (OT)
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYR | 19 | 09 | 16 | 11 | 325 |
| PHI | 110 | 110 | 08 | 00 | 228 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 2:51NYRMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Artemi Panarin · Snap, 0.14 xG1–0
- P1 15:05PHIOwen TippettPPUnassisted · Snap, 0.30 xG1–1
- P2 11:16PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Kevin Hayes · Snap, 0.18 xG1–2
- P3 10:33NYRChris KreiderAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Vincent Trocheck · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
- OT 2:32NYRVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Filip Chytil, Braden Schneider · Snap, 0.08 xG3–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 2:35PHIScott Laughton: Slashing2 min · PPG
- P1 4:02NYRArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
- P1 10:31NYRBarclay Goodrow: Hooking2 min
- P1 14:40NYRJacob Trouba: Tripping2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Cates
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New York Rangers
Forward lines
- bestTrocheck – Goodrow – Panarin14:15
xG 0.81–0.28 (74%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1
- Chytil – Kakko – Lafrenière13:35
xG 0.84–0.32 (73%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
- Tarasenko – Zibanejad – Vesey2:28
xG 0.01–0.18 (4%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
- Kreider – Tarasenko – Zibanejad12:47
xG 0.13–1.07 (11%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFox – Schneider2:50
xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Trouba – Fox2:30
xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
- Trouba – Mikkola3:33
xG 0.15–0.01 (94%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestTippett – Frost – Farabee10:39
xG 1.18–0.50 (70%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0
- Laughton – Allison – Cates6:38
xG 0.14–0.07 (65%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Deslauriers – Brown – Desnoyers3:19
xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Laughton – Tippett – Cates3:13
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestProvorov – York14:18
xG 1.06–0.14 (88%)attempts 15–4goals 1–0
- Ristolainen – Provorov2:38
xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Braun – Provorov2:16
xG 0.09–0.06 (59%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − NYR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).