Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 7, 2023·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 0, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 90% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS020506013
COL31931509643

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:08COLCale MakarGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:51COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Devon Toews, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:01COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Samuel Girard, Artturi Lehkonen · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 1:22COLValeri NichushkinAssists: Cale Makar, Nathan MacKinnon · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–4
  5. P2 2:45COLDenis MalginAssists: Matt Nieto, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–5
  6. P2 18:21COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Cale Makar, Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.21 xG0–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 15:39SJSTomas Hertl: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 4:53SJSFabian Zetterlund: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 7:25COLJack Johnson: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 9:18SJSMatt Benning: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 19:00COLBowen Byram: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 3:27SJSErik Karlsson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P3 3:27SJSErik Karlsson: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 12:43COLJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 14:40SJSJames Reimer: Holding2 min
  10. P3 0:00SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
49% to win51% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Eller
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
13Shots on goal43
0.9Expected goals3.4
35Shot attempts70
31Faceoffs won28
3Power plays5
30Penalty minutes6
42Hits25
16Blocked shots16
8Giveaways5
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Barabanov – Eklund2:38

    xG 0.11–0.04 (71%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Lindblom – Labanc – Lorentz8:44

    xG 0.09–0.33 (22%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0

  3. Svechnikov – Gregor – Sturm7:24

    xG 0.11–0.37 (24%)attempts 4–9goals 0–2

  4. Couture – Johnsson – Barabanov8:53

    xG 0.17–0.46 (26%)attempts 6–12goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. Benning – Ferraro2:12

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Benning9:40

    xG 0.27–0.43 (38%)attempts 7–10goals 0–2

  3. Pouliot – Ferraro10:35

    xG 0.08–0.29 (21%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Nichushkin5:57

    xG 0.79–0.03 (96%)attempts 11–4goals 4–0

  2. Cogliano – Eller – O'Connor7:18

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Nieto – Malgin – Newhook3:52

    xG 0.24–0.02 (91%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Compher – Rantanen – Rodrigues6:53

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Byram13:01

    xG 0.96–0.06 (94%)attempts 18–7goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Makar10:04

    xG 0.83–0.03 (97%)attempts 17–4goals 4–0

  3. Toews – Girard2:22

    xG 0.15–0.02 (86%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.4 xGSJS 0.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1305 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.51 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 90% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).