Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 11, 2023·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Minnesota Wild 5, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 54% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN15113311529
SJS01811118237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:44MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman · Snap, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:19SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:03MINFrederick GaudreauPPAssists: Marcus Johansson, Marcus Foligno · Slap, 0.36 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:30MINMarcus JohanssonGWGAssists: John Klingberg, Matt Boldy · Tip-in, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P3 8:36SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Logan Couture, Alexander Barabanov · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:00MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Ryan Hartman, John Klingberg · Slap, 0.37 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:03MINMatt BoldyENAssists: Jared Spurgeon · Backhand, 0.37 xG5–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 17:40MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:28SJSTomas Hertl: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 19:47SJSNoah Gregor: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 7:49MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 10:04MINJon Merrill: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 16:18SJSEvgeny Svechnikov: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 8:27MINJohn Klingberg: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 8:36MINMats Zuccarello: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  9. P3 9:40SJSWilliam Eklund: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
49% to win51% to win
← MIN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSJS
29Shots on goal37
3.9Expected goals3.6
56Shot attempts68
36Faceoffs won35
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
22Hits12
19Blocked shots12
10Giveaways10
11Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar6:55

    xG 0.20–0.31 (38%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Sundqvist – Gaudreau10:56

    xG 0.20–0.34 (37%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy10:44

    xG 0.42–0.73 (37%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

  4. Zuccarello – Hartman – Steel11:06

    xG 0.31–0.94 (25%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Middleton13:35

    xG 0.43–0.61 (41%)attempts 6–18goals 0–0

  2. Merrill – Klingberg14:49

    xG 0.35–0.84 (29%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

  3. Goligoski – Dumba17:00

    xG 0.44–1.19 (27%)attempts 14–21goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Johnsson – Barabanov11:32

    xG 1.03–0.21 (83%)attempts 13–5goals 0–1

  2. Hertl – Zetterlund – Eklund10:39

    xG 0.97–0.50 (66%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  3. Lindblom – Labanc – Lorentz4:24

    xG 0.14–0.00 (98%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Labanc – Gregor – Sturm2:55

    xG 0.13–0.12 (51%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPouliot – Ferraro12:52

    xG 1.22–0.29 (81%)attempts 19–9goals 0–1

  2. Karlsson – Knyzhov15:18

    xG 0.99–0.44 (69%)attempts 23–9goals 0–1

  3. Vlasic – Benning9:20

    xG 0.15–0.33 (31%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.6 xGMIN 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #604 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.55 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 54% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).