Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 18, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Boston Bruins 5, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS11621527538
MIN19010112231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:45MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:38BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:43BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:03BOSDavid KrejciGWGAssists: Pavel Zacha, David Pastrnak · Deflected, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:17MINOskar SundqvistPPAssists: Frederick Gaudreau, Marcus Johansson · Snap, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:22BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.14 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:03BOSTrent FredericENAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.69 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 11:00BOSBrad Marchand: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 1:42BOSGarnet Hathaway: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P2 1:42MINMason Shaw: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 4:51MINJon Merrill: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 8:07MINJon Merrill: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:13BOSPavel Zacha: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 14:26MINAlex Goligoski: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:56BOSHampus Lindholm: Cross checking2 min
  9. P2 18:33BOSDmitry Orlov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 7:09BOSJake DeBrusk: Slashing2 min · PPG
  11. P3 19:53MINCalen Addison: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← BOS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dewar won the faceoff against Nosek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSMIN
38Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals3.2
59Shot attempts57
36Faceoffs won24
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
29Hits16
12Blocked shots9
6Giveaways9
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Bertuzzi – Frederic9:56

    xG 0.60–0.07 (90%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Bergeron – Marchand – DeBrusk8:16

    xG 0.52–0.47 (53%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  3. Krejci – Pastrnak – Zacha8:29

    xG 0.50–0.60 (45%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  4. Hathaway – Nosek – Lauko7:43

    xG 0.04–0.43 (9%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Clifton14:08

    xG 0.86–0.28 (75%)attempts 20–7goals 2–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Clifton2:52

    xG 0.20–0.14 (60%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Lindholm – Carlo12:28

    xG 0.59–0.67 (47%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Walker9:50

    xG 0.51–0.17 (75%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy8:49

    xG 0.60–0.51 (54%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  3. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar6:27

    xG 0.12–0.04 (74%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Sundqvist – Gaudreau – Steel8:18

    xG 0.29–0.47 (38%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Dumba14:08

    xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  2. Merrill – Addison9:21

    xG 0.54–0.24 (69%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  3. Spurgeon – Klingberg12:37

    xG 0.31–0.85 (26%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.2 xGBOS 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #622 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).