Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 27, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Seattle Kraken 1, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 70% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA013013110136
MIN152728520

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:17MINJake MiddletonAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Marcus Johansson · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:38MINMatt BoldyPPGWGAssists: Marcus Johansson, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:59MINMatt BoldyAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Snap, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P3 0:50MINMatt BoldyAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Slap, 0.13 xG0–4
  5. P3 10:21MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Jon Merrill · Snap, 0.12 xG0–5
  6. P3 11:00SEAJaden SchwartzAssists: Morgan Geekie, Vince Dunn · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:34SEAJaden Schwartz: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 11:16MINAlex Goligoski: Holding2 min
  3. P1 15:32MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:08SEAVince Dunn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:54MINMats Zuccarello: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 7:54SEAVince Dunn: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 2:55MINConnor Dewar: Holding2 min
  8. P3 2:55SEARyan Donato: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 2:55MINConnor Dewar: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 4:10SEAOliver Bjorkstrand: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 18:41SEAYanni Gourde: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 18:41MINMason Shaw: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← SEA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Gaudreau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAMIN
36Shots on goal20
3.3Expected goals2.1
65Shot attempts38
28Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
18Penalty minutes18
16Hits26
7Blocked shots16
2Giveaways4
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Wennberg – Geekie11:04

    xG 1.16–0.03 (98%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Donato – Sprong – Tanev7:03

    xG 0.44–0.06 (89%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  3. Gourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen8:01

    xG 0.07–0.01 (83%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Eberle – McCann – Beniers11:31

    xG 0.51–0.73 (41%)attempts 10–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn17:12

    xG 1.04–0.46 (69%)attempts 20–14goals 1–2

  2. Oleksiak – Borgen14:49

    xG 0.87–0.32 (73%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Soucy11:28

    xG 0.38–0.43 (47%)attempts 9–6goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy9:53

    xG 0.83–0.49 (63%)attempts 13–9goals 3–0

  2. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar3:30

    xG 0.07–0.12 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Sundqvist – Gaudreau – Duhaime8:25

    xG 0.08–0.38 (18%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Zuccarello – Hartman10:42

    xG 0.01–0.69 (2%)attempts 2–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Brodin – Dumba15:06

    xG 0.44–0.62 (42%)attempts 8–14goals 1–1

  2. Spurgeon – Middleton14:31

    xG 0.68–1.01 (40%)attempts 13–16goals 3–0

  3. Goligoski – Merrill14:21

    xG 0.14–0.73 (16%)attempts 4–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.1 xGSEA 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #1161 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.71 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 70% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).