Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 30, 2023·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Ottawa Senators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 93% of the time.

OTT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI02133600411
OTT11721011712546

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:58OTTAustin WatsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:51PHITony DeAngeloPPAssists: Cam York, Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:43OTTTim StützleAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Nick Holden · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:50OTTShane PintoPPAssists: Mathieu Joseph · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:28OTTClaude GirouxAssists: Tim Stützle, Tyler Kleven · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:22PHICam YorkUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 9:54PHINoah CatesPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Tony DeAngelo · Deflected, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:21PHIOwen TippettAssists: Travis Sanheim, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:36OTTAlex DeBrincatGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 2:10PHIBrendan Lemieux: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 1:32OTTShane Pinto: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:13OTTAlex DeBrincat: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 8:13PHIJoel Farabee: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 9:10OTTAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 9:10PHINicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 9:10PHINicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 9:10OTTMark Kastelic: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 9:10OTTMark Kastelic: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 9:10OTTMark Kastelic: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P2 9:10PHINicolas Deslauriers: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P2 12:27PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 12:27OTTErik Brannstrom: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 12:27PHIKieffer Bellows: Too many men on the ice2 min
  15. P2 15:01PHIIvan Provorov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  16. P3 9:43OTTAustin Watson: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
49% to win51% to win
← PHI attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stützle won the faceoff against Frost
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIOTT
11Shots on goal46
1.5Expected goals4.9
30Shot attempts82
29Faceoffs won35
2Power plays3
33Penalty minutes41
35Hits24
13Blocked shots9
8Giveaways14
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Laughton – Allison – Cates8:10

    xG 0.21–0.24 (47%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Hayes – Lemieux9:55

    xG 0.42–0.56 (43%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Laughton – Lemieux – Cates3:39

    xG 0.11–0.51 (18%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Deslauriers – Bellows – Laczynski3:00

    xG 0.00–0.50 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Sanheim – DeAngelo3:04

    xG 0.36–0.48 (43%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

  2. Seeler – DeAngelo12:05

    xG 0.03–0.58 (5%)attempts 2–19goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Sanheim13:32

    xG 0.16–0.85 (16%)attempts 4–17goals 1–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Tkachuk – Stützle14:25

    xG 1.76–0.30 (85%)attempts 25–9goals 2–1

  2. Watson – Brown – Kastelic3:40

    xG 0.34–0.12 (74%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Watson – Brown – Gambrell4:55

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  4. DeBrincat – Batherson – Pinto12:04

    xG 0.62–0.56 (53%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Brannstrom6:17

    xG 0.81–0.14 (85%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  2. Sanderson – Zub10:45

    xG 0.79–0.13 (85%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Brannstrom – Zub7:08

    xG 0.64–0.24 (73%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 4.9 xGPHI 1.5 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #59 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.19 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 93% of the time.

OTT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).