Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 8, 2023·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Seattle Kraken 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11028011329
SEA31321424731

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:48SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Jesper Froden, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:44CHISeth JonesAssists: Anders Bjork, Andreas Athanasiou · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:55SEAJordan EberleAssists: Jamie Oleksiak · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:09SEAYanni GourdePPAssists: Jordan Eberle, Daniel Sprong · Bat, 0.27 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:39CHISeth JonesPPAssists: Lukas Reichel, Andreas Athanasiou · Slap, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:21SEAAdam LarssonGWGAssists: Jared McCann, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P2 13:16SEADaniel SprongAssists: Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–5
  8. P2 15:02CHILukas ReichelAssists: Alex Vlasic, Jason Dickinson · Tip-in, 0.21 xG3–5
  9. P3 11:54SEAJared McCannAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–6
  10. P3 14:51SEAMorgan GeekieAssists: Daniel Sprong, Ryan Donato · Snap, 0.13 xG3–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:42SEAJamie Oleksiak: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 14:29CHIJonathan Toews: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 17:30CHISeth Jones: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:38CHIJarred Tinordi: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:08SEAMorgan Geekie: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:14SEAAdam Larsson: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 13:30SEAVince Dunn: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 13:30CHIConnor Murphy: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
49% to win51% to win
← CHI attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Khaira won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISEA
29Shots on goal31
2.5Expected goals3.3
62Shot attempts50
36Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
13Hits18
12Blocked shots17
6Giveaways7
3Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAthanasiou – Bjork – Reichel9:32

    xG 0.56–0.37 (60%)attempts 16–3goals 1–2

  2. Wagner – Entwistle – Johnson7:14

    xG 0.10–0.09 (51%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Johnson – Dickinson9:52

    xG 0.41–0.51 (44%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  4. Khaira – Anderson – Katchouk9:57

    xG 0.31–0.52 (37%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Vlasic11:50

    xG 0.56–0.16 (78%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Kaiser7:31

    xG 0.15–0.06 (71%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  3. Jones – Jones7:51

    xG 0.50–0.44 (53%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – McCann – Beniers9:49

    xG 0.48–0.20 (70%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Sprong – Tanev – Geekie7:12

    xG 0.46–0.30 (61%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Gourde – Tolvanen – Froden9:56

    xG 0.20–0.17 (54%)attempts 5–15goals 1–0

  4. Bjorkstrand – Wennberg – Tanev2:28

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Borgen13:50

    xG 0.58–0.49 (54%)attempts 8–19goals 3–0

  2. Schultz – Soucy11:05

    xG 0.44–0.50 (47%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

  3. Larsson – Dunn15:31

    xG 0.13–0.49 (21%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.3 xGCHI 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEACHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #373 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).