Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Apr 10, 2023·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Carolina Hurricanes 2, Ottawa Senators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 66% of the time.

OTT winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR0918112229
OTT210012110332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:51OTTClaude GirouxAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Tim Stützle · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:26OTTTim StützleAssists: Claude Giroux, Brady Tkachuk · Snap, 0.21 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:30CARBrett PesceAssists: Martin Necas, Brady Skjei · Snap, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:23CARBrent BurnsPPAssists: Seth Jarvis, Martin Necas · Slap, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:37OTTClaude GirouxGWGAssists: Shane Pinto, Erik Brannstrom · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:28OTTArtem Zub: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  2. P1 9:02CARJordan Martinook: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:18CARSebastian Aho: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:49OTTJulien Gauthier: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:58CARJordan Martinook: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 14:25OTTBrady Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:25CARJack Drury: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 16:36CARSebastian Aho: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 1:17OTTTim Stützle: Kneeing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 7:03OTTBrady Tkachuk: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 8:18OTTTim Stützle: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 9:23CARStefan Noesen: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  13. P3 9:23CARStefan Noesen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
49% to win51% to win
← CAR attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kastelic won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CAROTT
29Shots on goal32
3.1Expected goals4.1
54Shot attempts51
29Faceoffs won34
5Power plays6
14Penalty minutes12
15Hits15
8Blocked shots18
11Giveaways14
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Fast – Martinook3:40

    xG 0.12–0.01 (93%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Stepan – Noesen – Drury3:13

    xG 0.10–0.05 (68%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Noesen – Aho – Jarvis2:04

    xG 0.00–0.01 (26%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Teravainen – Aho – Puljujarvi5:05

    xG 0.10–0.21 (33%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Chatfield10:16

    xG 0.25–0.16 (62%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  2. Skjei – Pesce10:57

    xG 0.29–0.60 (33%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  3. Burns – Slavin12:00

    xG 0.19–0.75 (21%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Tkachuk – Stützle8:50

    xG 0.58–0.19 (75%)attempts 11–9goals 2–0

  2. Brown – Joseph – Kastelic6:05

    xG 0.27–0.02 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. DeBrincat – Batherson – Pinto7:40

    xG 0.19–0.07 (74%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Gauthier – Gambrell – Sokolov2:05

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanderson – Zub11:09

    xG 0.74–0.19 (79%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Bernard-Docker – Kleven6:52

    xG 0.18–0.10 (63%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Holden – Brannstrom10:16

    xG 0.46–0.42 (52%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 4.1 xGCAR 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #499 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 66% of the time.

OTT winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).