Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 11, 2023·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CBJ290811202331
PHI2151160612439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:47CBJLiam FoudyAssists: Carson Meyer, Tim Berni · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:43CBJTrey Fix-WolanskyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:59PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Travis Konecny, Morgan Frost · Snap, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:33PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Ivan Provorov, Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 0:47PHIOwen TippettPPAssists: Noah Cates, Rasmus Ristolainen · Snap, 0.25 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:50CBJSean KuralyPPAssists: Jake Christiansen, Johnny Gaudreau · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:44PHIOwen TippettGWGAssists: Ivan Provorov, Cam York · Snap, 0.30 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 17:07CBJJosh Dunne: Holding2 min
  2. P1 17:07PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:54CBJTim Berni: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 18:50CBJKent Johnson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 19:06PHITravis Konecny: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 2:27PHIAdam Ginning: Holding2 min
  7. P3 3:34CBJKirill Marchenko: Interference2 min
  8. P3 4:20PHICam York: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 14:06CBJCarson Meyer: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
49% to win51% to win
← CBJ attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Frost won the faceoff against Kuraly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPHI
31Shots on goal39
2.2Expected goals3.8
54Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
10Penalty minutes8
18Hits26
15Blocked shots13
9Giveaways6
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Roslovic – Fix-Wolansky – Johnson5:25

    xG 0.13–0.10 (56%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Gaudreau – Roslovic – Marchenko2:12

    xG 0.04–0.07 (35%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Gaudreau – Kuraly – Fix-Wolansky3:00

    xG 0.00–0.12 (3%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Kuraly – Marchenko6:30

    xG 0.22–0.33 (39%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Peeke – Bayreuther15:25

    xG 0.37–0.36 (51%)attempts 16–12goals 0–1

  2. Christiansen – Jiricek13:22

    xG 0.35–0.47 (43%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0

  3. Boqvist – Berni13:21

    xG 0.34–0.76 (31%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestKonecny – Frost – Farabee8:25

    xG 0.50–0.32 (61%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  2. Hayes – Tippett – Cates8:00

    xG 0.28–0.26 (52%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Laughton – Allison7:12

    xG 0.16–0.27 (38%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  4. Deslauriers – Lemieux – Laczynski6:37

    xG 0.07–0.24 (23%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Ginning13:42

    xG 0.76–0.45 (63%)attempts 21–13goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim13:03

    xG 0.47–0.40 (54%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Provorov – York16:56

    xG 0.30–0.41 (42%)attempts 14–10goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.8 xGCBJ 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #317 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).