Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 24, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Edmonton Oilers 4, Minnesota Wild 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM2111918428
MIN28013511732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:54EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Evander Kane, Leon Draisaitl · Slap, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:47MINMarco RossiAssists: Ryan Hartman, Jake Middleton · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:27EDMWarren FoegeleAssists: Evan Bouchard, Mattias Ekholm · Slap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:01MINRyan HartmanAssists: Jake Middleton, Calen Addison · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 0:32EDMWarren FoegeleAssists: Darnell Nurse, Zach Hyman · Snap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:38MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kirill Kaprizov · Snap, 0.23 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:48MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:28MINJoel Eriksson EkGWGAssists: Patrick Maroon, Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–5
  9. P3 12:55EDMEvander KanePPAssists: Evan Bouchard, Leon Draisaitl · Tip-in, 0.12 xG4–5
  10. P3 15:50MINRyan HartmanAssists: Jake Middleton, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–6
  11. P3 16:37MINMarcus FolignoENAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.67 xG4–7
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 1:39MINJon Merrill: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 2:25MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 5:19EDMDylan Holloway: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 10:22MINRyan Hartman: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 12:46MINMarco Rossi: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P1 17:56MINBrandon Duhaime: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 17:56EDMEvander Kane: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 2:03EDMDylan Holloway: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P3 12:45MINDakota Mermis: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P3 14:21MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 14:21EDMVincent Desharnais: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 17:45EDMWarren Foegele: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against Nugent-Hopkins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMMIN
28Shots on goal32
3.2Expected goals4.8
59Shot attempts57
36Faceoffs won24
5Power plays3
13Penalty minutes17
17Hits25
13Blocked shots16
7Giveaways9
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Janmark – Draisaitl7:59

    xG 0.83–0.26 (76%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Brown – McLeod – Holloway6:08

    xG 0.47–0.06 (88%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – Foegele8:28

    xG 0.35–0.40 (47%)attempts 9–11goals 2–2

  4. Janmark – Erne – Ryan2:30

    xG 0.07–0.16 (31%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulak – Desharnais9:14

    xG 0.34–0.10 (77%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Ekholm – Broberg3:23

    xG 0.32–0.14 (69%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Ekholm – Bouchard7:56

    xG 0.67–0.54 (56%)attempts 10–9goals 2–3

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov10:20

    xG 1.15–0.22 (84%)attempts 18–7goals 3–1

  2. Duhaime – Lettieri – Dewar4:14

    xG 0.41–0.19 (68%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Gaudreau – Rossi7:49

    xG 0.04–0.32 (12%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

  4. Maroon – Johansson – Eriksson Ek11:38

    xG 0.29–0.67 (30%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiddleton – Addison12:06

    xG 1.23–0.35 (78%)attempts 13–14goals 3–2

  2. Merrill – Mermis11:26

    xG 0.61–0.44 (58%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Faber17:19

    xG 0.73–1.33 (35%)attempts 10–21goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 4.8 xGEDM 3.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #133 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).