Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 27, 2023·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

St. Louis Blues 0, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL0301108022
VAN11931115535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:59VANQuinn HughesGWGAssists: Filip Hronek · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:48VANQuinn HughesAssists: Brock Boeser, J.T. Miller · Backhand, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:58VANPhillip Di GiuseppeAssists: Tyler Myers, J.T. Miller · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–3
  4. P2 8:52VANJ.T. MillerSHAssists: Elias Pettersson · Backhand, 0.33 xG0–4
  5. P3 6:35VANIlya MikheyevAssists: Elias Pettersson, Andrei Kuzmenko · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:17STLPavel Buchnevich: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 10:09STLBrandon Saad: Holding2 min
  3. P1 12:22STLAlexey Toropchenko: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:26STLBrandon Saad: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 8:32VANQuinn Hughes: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 16:37VANSam Lafferty: Holding2 min
  7. P3 7:36VANPius Suter: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 7:36STLBrayden Schenn: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 12:19VANMark Friedman: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 12:19STLAlexey Toropchenko: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 15:59STLTorey Krug: Holding2 min
  12. P3 15:59VANNils Hoglander: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Schenn won the faceoff against Suter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLVAN
22Shots on goal35
1.4Expected goals3.4
35Shot attempts70
26Faceoffs won29
2Power plays4
14Penalty minutes10
29Hits12
18Blocked shots2
4Giveaways3
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Buchnevich – Kyrou – Thomas4:03

    xG 0.25–0.21 (55%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  2. Schenn – Saad – Kapanen4:09

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Sundqvist – Toropchenko – Neighbours2:01

    xG 0.00–0.02 (9%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Blais – Neighbours2:36

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Faulk – Krug9:11

    xG 0.17–0.22 (44%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Faulk – Perunovich3:20

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Parayko – Perunovich4:05

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPettersson – Mikheyev – Kuzmenko7:19

    xG 0.58–0.06 (90%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Lafferty – Beauvillier – Hoglander7:01

    xG 0.51–0.16 (76%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  3. Miller – Di Giuseppe – Boeser7:37

    xG 0.45–0.19 (70%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  4. Joshua – Garland – Suter8:48

    xG 0.30–0.08 (79%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Friedman11:40

    xG 1.08–0.06 (95%)attempts 20–2goals 1–0

  2. Hronek – Hughes10:33

    xG 0.53–0.31 (63%)attempts 13–7goals 2–0

  3. Myers – Soucy11:26

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.4 xGSTL 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 6/100 · #1240 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).