Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 29, 2023·Prudential Center, Newark

Minnesota Wild 3, New Jersey Devils 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

NJD winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN11011717334
NJD19310011430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:13NJDJesper BrattAssists: John Marino, Kevin Bahl · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:53MINPatrick MaroonAssists: Jonas Brodin, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:31MINRyan HartmanPPAssists: Calen Addison, Joel Eriksson Ek · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:10NJDTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Jesper Bratt, Luke Hughes · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:54NJDErik HaulaUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P2 16:39NJDJesper BrattPPGWGAssists: Timo Meier, Luke Hughes · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–4
  7. P3 15:17MINJake MiddletonAssists: Patrick Maroon, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:15MINJake Middleton: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:52NJDDougie Hamilton: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 2:23NJDErik Haula: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:45MINRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:04NJDChris Tierney: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 12:23NJDTimo Meier: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 16:10MINDakota Mermis: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 9:20NJDCurtis Lazar: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 18:23NJDErik Haula: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against McLeod
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNJD
34Shots on goal30
3.2Expected goals2.5
68Shot attempts59
28Faceoffs won23
6Power plays3
6Penalty minutes12
14Hits10
16Blocked shots19
2Giveaways3
2Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Foligno – Rossi5:01

    xG 0.21–0.12 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Duhaime – Lettieri – Dewar5:02

    xG 0.02–0.01 (61%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov9:47

    xG 0.29–0.35 (45%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Foligno – Eriksson Ek2:30

    xG 0.14–0.22 (39%)attempts 1–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Faber17:19

    xG 0.36–0.22 (62%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  2. Mermis – Middleton13:22

    xG 0.59–0.53 (53%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  3. Merrill – Hunt4:43

    xG 0.03–0.14 (17%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestHaula – Lazar – Mercer9:02

    xG 0.61–0.11 (85%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Palat – Bratt – McLeod8:52

    xG 0.47–0.02 (95%)attempts 14–3goals 1–0

  3. Tierney – Bastian – Holtz4:25

    xG 0.07–0.14 (33%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Toffoli – Meier – Hughes11:35

    xG 0.25–0.51 (33%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamilton – Siegenthaler15:33

    xG 0.67–0.43 (61%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

  2. Marino – Bahl13:21

    xG 0.46–0.25 (65%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  3. Smith – Hughes10:44

    xG 0.51–0.41 (55%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.5 xGMIN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #579 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.69 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

NJD winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).