Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 30, 2023·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Seattle Kraken 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 66% of the time.

TBL winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SEA3200130515443
TBL1911511300337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:08SEABrian DumoulinAssists: Justin Schultz, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:08SEAYanni GourdeAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Jared McCann · Snap, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:37TBLTanner JeannotAssists: Haydn Fleury, Darren Raddysh · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:52SEAKailer YamamotoPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Eeli Tolvanen · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–1
  5. P2 3:40TBLAlex Barré-BouletPPAssists: Brandon Hagel, Tanner Jeannot · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:32TBLBrandon HagelAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Alex Barré-Boulet · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:53SEAJared McCannPPGWGAssists: Vince Dunn, Oliver Bjorkstrand · Slap, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 15:07TBLMichael Eyssimont: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:36SEAJamie Oleksiak: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 11:27TBLMikhail Sergachev: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 14:27SEAAlexander Wennberg: High sticking2 min
  5. OT 1:59TBLNick Paul: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← SEA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cirelli won the faceoff against Gourde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEATBL
43Shots on goal37
4.2Expected goals3.0
79Shot attempts71
20Faceoffs won30
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
22Hits21
19Blocked shots14
2Giveaways9
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Schwartz – Wennberg12:54

    xG 0.99–0.31 (76%)attempts 20–15goals 1–0

  2. Bjorkstrand – Kartye – Beniers7:32

    xG 0.27–0.10 (73%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Shore – Bellemare – Yamamoto4:26

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – McCann – Tolvanen12:22

    xG 0.42–0.74 (36%)attempts 17–21goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn19:37

    xG 1.16–0.48 (71%)attempts 27–17goals 0–1

  2. Schultz – Dumoulin13:25

    xG 0.79–0.27 (74%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

  3. Oleksiak – Borgen11:58

    xG 0.49–1.07 (31%)attempts 10–23goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGlendening – Jeannot – Merela3:40

    xG 0.22–0.02 (92%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Stamkos – Kucherov – Point7:29

    xG 0.28–0.16 (64%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Paul – Sheary – Barré-Boulet2:38

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Kucherov – Point – Barré-Boulet8:48

    xG 0.47–0.57 (45%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRaddysh – Sergachev3:44

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 0–0

  2. Fleury – Raddysh10:32

    xG 0.32–0.64 (33%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  3. Hedman – Cernak18:42

    xG 0.82–1.33 (38%)attempts 24–23goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.0 xGSEA 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #232 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 66% of the time.

TBL winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).