Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 4, 2023·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Nashville Predators 5, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH11031519534
EDM111114010235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:57EDMDarnell NursePPAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Ryan McLeod · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:22NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Marc Del Gaizo · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:23NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Filip Forsberg, Alexandre Carrier · Slap, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:24NSHRyan O'ReillyPPGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg, Tommy Novak · Slap, 0.36 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:08EDMZach HymanPPAssists: Evan Bouchard, Connor McDavid · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:15NSHTommy NovakAssists: Luke Evangelista, Roman Josi · Snap, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 8:22NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Alexandre Carrier · Snap, 0.32 xG5–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 9:36NSHJeremy Lauzon: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:58EDMVincent Desharnais: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 2:47EDMEvander Kane: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:36NSHAlexandre Carrier: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  5. P2 5:30EDMRyan McLeod: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 6:05NSHTommy Novak: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 7:39EDMZach Hyman: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 5:55EDMEvander Kane: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 5:55NSHJuuso Parssinen: Embellishment2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHEDM
34Shots on goal35
4.1Expected goals3.1
51Shot attempts64
41Faceoffs won21
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
25Hits33
16Blocked shots6
7Giveaways19
9Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestNyquist – O'Reilly – Forsberg10:44

    xG 1.19–0.39 (75%)attempts 12–5goals 3–0

  2. Sissons – Trenin – Smith9:52

    xG 0.37–0.30 (55%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Novak – Sherwood – Evangelista7:38

    xG 0.59–0.55 (52%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  4. Foudy – Tomasino – Parssinen7:17

    xG 0.32–0.32 (49%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLauzon – Carrier14:49

    xG 1.26–0.40 (76%)attempts 16–7goals 2–0

  2. Josi – Fabbro11:57

    xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  3. Barrie – Del Gaizo12:53

    xG 0.78–0.85 (48%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestGagner – Kane – Nugent-Hopkins5:27

    xG 0.60–0.14 (81%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Foegele – McLeod – Holloway3:15

    xG 0.27–0.08 (77%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Gagner – Nugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl4:09

    xG 0.29–0.22 (57%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Draisaitl – Foegele – McDavid2:30

    xG 0.03–0.05 (38%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard15:28

    xG 0.99–0.32 (76%)attempts 21–14goals 0–0

  2. Kulak – Desharnais13:53

    xG 0.47–1.00 (32%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

  3. Ceci – Nurse13:35

    xG 0.65–1.41 (32%)attempts 14–16goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.1 xGNSH 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #643 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).