Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 4, 2023·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Pittsburgh Penguins 10, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT285173101035
SJS091819226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:30PITReilly SmithPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:55PITReilly SmithAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:21PITJake GuentzelGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, Pierre-Olivier Joseph · Snap, 0.33 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:26PITVinnie HinostrozaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P2 8:34SJSAnthony DuclairPPAssists: Tomas Hertl, Jacob MacDonald · Slap, 0.19 xG4–1
  6. P2 9:12PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Reilly Smith, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–1
  7. P2 9:27PITKris LetangAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Backhand, 0.11 xG6–1
  8. P2 11:53PITMatt NietoAssists: Noel Acciari, Vinnie Hinostroza · Snap, 0.20 xG7–1
  9. P3 0:49PITBryan RustAssists: Jake Guentzel, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.15 xG8–1
  10. P3 9:20SJSJacob MacDonaldPPAssists: Tomas Hertl, Anthony Duclair · Slap, 0.07 xG8–2
  11. P3 11:02PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Reilly Smith, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.13 xG9–2
  12. P3 12:10PITJake GuentzelUnassisted · Wrist, 0.37 xG10–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:49SJSAnthony Duclair: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:10PITJake Guentzel: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 17:19PITMarcus Pettersson: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:04PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:41PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:06SJSNikolai Knyzhov: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 18:18PITErik Karlsson: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 2:40SJSLuke Kunin: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 8:30PITVinnie Hinostroza: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 10:14SJSLuke Kunin: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSJS
35Shots on goal26
3.5Expected goals2.6
64Shot attempts54
32Faceoffs won25
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
16Hits45
12Blocked shots21
5Giveaways8
11Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel11:42

    xG 1.31–0.75 (64%)attempts 15–10goals 4–0

  2. Nieto – Hinostroza – Acciari7:49

    xG 0.58–0.13 (82%)attempts 9–8goals 2–0

  3. Malkin – Smith – Rakell9:40

    xG 0.69–0.40 (63%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  4. Eller – O'Connor – Zohorna8:50

    xG 0.15–0.13 (53%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson13:13

    xG 1.37–0.11 (93%)attempts 14–10goals 5–0

  2. Letang – Graves13:23

    xG 0.79–0.30 (72%)attempts 20–10goals 2–0

  3. Shea – Joseph11:52

    xG 0.80–1.00 (45%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHoffman – Hertl – Duclair9:16

    xG 0.80–0.39 (67%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  2. Granlund – Zetterlund – Eklund10:41

    xG 0.24–0.65 (27%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

  3. Kunin – Zadina – Sturm7:53

    xG 0.13–0.72 (15%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Knyzhov10:58

    xG 0.65–0.57 (53%)attempts 11–17goals 0–1

  2. Burroughs – Ferraro10:28

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Rutta – Okhotiuk7:32

    xG 0.05–0.87 (6%)attempts 2–11goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.6 xGPIT 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #1034 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).