Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 14, 2023·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT112112317541
CBJ26013111330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:10PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:29CBJKirill MarchenkoUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:28CBJEgor ChinakhovAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:04PITJake GuentzelAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.26 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:40PITErik KarlssonAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:45CBJAlexandre TexierAssists: Sean Kuraly, Justin Danforth · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:28PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson, Jake Guentzel · Tip-in, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:23PITSidney CrosbyENAssists: Bryan Rust · Snap, 0.70 xG5–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 15:11PITVinnie Hinostroza: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 13:35PITRyan Graves: Interference2 min
  3. P2 18:24PITLars Eller: Cross checking2 min
  4. P3 1:13CBJSean Kuraly: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 12:13PITRadim Zohorna: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Jenner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
41Shots on goal30
4.2Expected goals3.3
72Shot attempts62
28Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
10Hits18
9Blocked shots22
1Giveaways2
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestEller – O'Connor – Zohorna10:09

    xG 0.88–0.11 (89%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Smith – Rakell11:47

    xG 1.14–0.63 (64%)attempts 16–9goals 1–2

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel13:14

    xG 0.52–0.27 (65%)attempts 19–12goals 2–1

  4. Nieto – Hinostroza – Acciari5:23

    xG 0.06–0.10 (39%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson15:18

    xG 1.16–0.31 (79%)attempts 17–12goals 3–0

  2. Ruhwedel – Shea7:51

    xG 0.74–0.16 (82%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Ruhwedel2:27

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Danforth – Texier10:26

    xG 0.84–0.74 (53%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  2. Gaudreau – Jenner – Laine3:00

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Jenner – Laine – Chinakhov9:25

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

  4. Gaudreau – Bemstrom – Sillinger8:51

    xG 0.30–0.52 (37%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Bean – Jiricek11:28

    xG 0.18–0.17 (51%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Severson – Werenski2:32

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Severson – Provorov15:41

    xG 1.19–1.72 (41%)attempts 20–27goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.3 xGPIT 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #124 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).