Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 24, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 3, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL191917325
MIN062708221

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:43COLRoss ColtonAssists: Bowen Byram, Riley Tufte · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:39COLValeri NichushkinPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Devon Toews · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:13MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Marco Rossi · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:21MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kirill Kaprizov · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:56COLKurtis MacDermidGWGAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Fredrik Olofsson · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:08COLJonathan Drouin: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:46MINMarco Rossi: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 1:03COLRoss Colton: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 2:38MINMarcus Johansson: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 3:45MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 7:31MINJake Middleton: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 12:17COLCaleb Jones: Holding2 min
  8. P2 13:22COLBowen Byram: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  9. P3 1:04MINBrock Faber: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 12:24MINJoel Eriksson Ek: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 15:42COLBowen Byram: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 17:38MINMatt Boldy: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
25Shots on goal21
3.6Expected goals2.9
65Shot attempts45
23Faceoffs won23
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes14
13Hits11
9Blocked shots18
5Giveaways7
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestWood – Colton – Kiviranta4:05

    xG 0.33–0.09 (78%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. MacKinnon – Drouin – Rantanen2:18

    xG 0.23–0.02 (94%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Drouin – Tufte4:57

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – MacDermid – Olofsson2:36

    xG 0.12–0.11 (54%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:15

    xG 0.80–0.41 (66%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Byram8:53

    xG 0.46–0.21 (68%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Manson2:14

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi8:35

    xG 0.59–0.29 (67%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  2. Foligno – Hartman – Eriksson Ek8:28

    xG 0.40–0.26 (61%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Gaudreau – Boldy6:23

    xG 0.12–0.20 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Duhaime – Dewar5:01

    xG 0.09–0.41 (18%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Merrill8:32

    xG 0.81–0.17 (82%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Faber13:15

    xG 0.64–0.61 (51%)attempts 16–15goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Middleton10:26

    xG 0.31–0.32 (49%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.9 xGCOL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #414 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).