Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 2, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI07115210011433
PIT0318215060332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 14:31PITKris LetangUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 16:47PHIOwen TippettAssists: Tyson Foerster · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:50PITJake GuentzelAssists: Erik Karlsson, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P3 7:01PHIScott LaughtonSHAssists: Nick Seeler · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:52PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Cam York, Sean Couturier · Snap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:39PITJake GuentzelAssists: Bryan Rust, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Tyson Foerster stopped
  2. 2. PIT Jake Guentzel stopped
  3. 3. PHI Sean Couturier scored
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  6. 6. PIT Bryan Rust stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 1:34PHIMorgan Frost: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 2:42PHICam York: Interference2 min
  3. P2 5:18PITRadim Zohorna: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 9:55PITDrew O'Connor: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 19:16PITBryan Rust: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 5:02PHINicolas Deslauriers: Boarding2 min
  7. P3 11:03PHIMarc Staal: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 12:10PITErik Karlsson: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. OT 4:00PHIJoel Farabee: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
33Shots on goal32
2.7Expected goals3.6
55Shot attempts80
26Faceoffs won42
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
39Hits24
26Blocked shots11
4Giveaways16
11Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestTippett – Frost – Brink8:15

    xG 0.61–0.08 (88%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Deslauriers – Hathaway – Poehling4:49

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Couturier – Konecny – Foerster9:23

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  4. Atkinson – Laughton – Farabee9:34

    xG 0.15–0.31 (33%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – York13:45

    xG 0.42–0.12 (78%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  2. Seeler – Walker14:57

    xG 0.50–0.37 (58%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0

  3. Staal – Ristolainen10:27

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel12:17

    xG 0.69–0.35 (66%)attempts 17–5goals 2–1

  2. Hinostroza – Koppanen – Zohorna3:30

    xG 0.01–0.11 (11%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Eller – Harkins7:43

    xG 0.02–0.22 (9%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Smith – O'Connor10:47

    xG 0.08–0.60 (12%)attempts 5–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Graves8:51

    xG 0.39–0.13 (76%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Shea2:32

    xG 0.19–0.09 (68%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

  3. Karlsson – Pettersson11:20

    xG 0.26–0.29 (47%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.6 xGPHI 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #82 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.17 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).