Wed, Dec 13, 2023·Centre Bell, Montreal
Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Montréal Canadiens 3 (SO)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 86% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | SO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 111 | 215 | 03 | 01 | 4 | 430 |
| MTL | 315 | 07 | 011 | 09 | 3 | 342 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 6:24MTLDavid SavardUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
- P1 12:21MTLJayden StrubleAssists: Michael Pezzetta, Jesse Ylonen · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–2
- P1 13:48PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Drew O'Connor · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
- P1 15:20MTLSean MonahanPPAssists: Nick Suzuki, Mike Matheson · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–3
- P2 5:36PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.14 xG2–3
- P2 11:02PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
Shootout
- 1. MTL Nick Suzuki scored
- 2. PIT Kris Letang scored
- 3. MTL Cole Caufield scored
- 4. PIT Sidney Crosby scored
- 5. MTL Jesse Ylonen stopped
- 6. PIT Jake Guentzel stopped
- 7. MTL Juraj Slafkovský stopped
- 8. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
- 9. MTL Joel Armia stopped
- 10. PIT Reilly Smith stopped
- 11. MTL Christian Dvorak stopped
- 12. PIT Erik Karlsson stopped
- 13. MTL Sean Monahan scored
- 14. PIT Lars Eller scored
- 15. MTL Mike Matheson stopped
- 16. PIT Jeff Carter stopped
- 17. MTL Michael Pezzetta stopped
- 18. PIT Valtteri Puustinen stopped
- 19. MTL Jake Evans stopped
- 20. PIT Radim Zohorna stopped
- 21. MTL Brendan Gallagher stopped
- 22. PIT Vinnie Hinostroza stopped
- 23. MTL Josh Anderson stopped
- 24. PIT Jansen Harkins scored
Penalties (7)
- P1 14:53PITMarcus Pettersson: Interference2 min · PPG
- P2 2:27MTLJohnathan Kovacevic: Interference2 min
- P2 4:26MTLMichael Pezzetta: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
- P2 10:15MTLJuraj Slafkovský: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P3 3:00PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
- P3 16:58PITDrew O'Connor: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- OT 1:04PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Suzuki
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestEller – Hinostroza – Zohorna3:35
xG 0.40–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Malkin – Smith – Puustinen11:04
xG 0.56–0.31 (64%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0
- Eller – O'Connor – Zohorna5:38
xG 0.24–0.13 (66%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
- Carter – Harkins – Gruden4:00
xG 0.00–0.26 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestLetang – Karlsson2:45
xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Karlsson – Graves2:22
xG 0.14–0.03 (81%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Letang – Pettersson2:52
xG 0.09–0.08 (53%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Montréal Canadiens
Forward lines
- bestSuzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský15:59
xG 1.37–0.24 (85%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0
- Anderson – Monahan – Evans12:59
xG 1.67–0.89 (65%)attempts 20–18goals 0–1
- Gallagher – Armia – Dvorak9:40
xG 0.21–0.11 (65%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0
- Stephens – Pezzetta – Ylonen5:04
xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 3–4goals 2–0
Defence pairs
- bestSavard – Matheson17:07
xG 2.09–0.28 (88%)attempts 22–13goals 1–0
- Matheson – Struble2:01
xG 0.16–0.08 (66%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
- Kovacevic – Struble11:01
xG 0.42–0.50 (46%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 86% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MTL − PIT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).