Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 14, 2023·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Calgary Flames 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY08117110021237
MIN110010111012332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:42MINMatt BoldyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 13:18CGYYegor SharangovichPPAssists: Elias Lindholm, Connor Zary · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P3 4:13CGYBlake ColemanSHAssists: Yegor Sharangovich, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.40 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:58MINMarco RossiAssists: Alex Goligoski, Marcus Johansson · Slap, 0.08 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mats Zuccarello scored
  2. 2. CGY Yegor Sharangovich scored
  3. 3. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  4. 4. CGY Elias Lindholm stopped
  5. 5. MIN Frederick Gaudreau stopped
  6. 6. CGY Jonathan Huberdeau stopped
  7. 7. MIN Matt Boldy scored
  8. 8. CGY Nazem Kadri stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 7:57MINMarco Rossi: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 11:25MINPatrick Maroon: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min · PPG
  3. P2 15:45CGYMikael Backlund: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 19:26MINPatrick Maroon: Interference2 min
  5. P2 19:26CGYMartin Pospisil: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 19:26MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 2:57CGYAndrew Mangiapane: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 15:46CGYJordan Oesterle: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYMIN
37Shots on goal32
3.5Expected goals3.2
62Shot attempts73
32Faceoffs won23
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
22Hits20
23Blocked shots10
6Giveaways10
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestLindholm – Mangiapane – Sharangovich11:58

    xG 0.98–0.37 (73%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil2:40

    xG 0.14–0.04 (78%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Greer – Dube – Ruzicka5:46

    xG 0.11–0.11 (50%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Backlund – Coleman – Huberdeau8:47

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – DeSimone10:11

    xG 0.69–0.55 (56%)attempts 17–12goals 0–0

  2. Weegar – Oesterle15:55

    xG 0.76–0.71 (52%)attempts 11–16goals 0–1

  3. Hanifin – Andersson16:47

    xG 0.29–0.88 (25%)attempts 13–23goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Zuccarello – Rossi10:58

    xG 0.65–0.22 (75%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – Foligno – Gaudreau7:09

    xG 0.19–0.19 (50%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy12:41

    xG 0.60–0.82 (42%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  4. Hartman – Duhaime – Dewar7:29

    xG 0.10–0.36 (22%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Bogosian11:07

    xG 0.78–0.18 (81%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Merrill – Mermis11:32

    xG 0.21–0.20 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Mermis2:03

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.2 xGCGY 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #318 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.16 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).