Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 18, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Minnesota Wild 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN0828111327
PIT11327110430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:39PITReilly SmithAssists: Valtteri Puustinen, Marcus Pettersson · Backhand, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:36PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:34PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Valtteri Puustinen, Marcus Pettersson · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–3
  4. P2 15:06MINRyan HartmanAssists: Brock Faber, Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:30MINJake MiddletonAssists: Matt Boldy, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:33MINVinni LettieriAssists: Jon Merrill, Daemon Hunt · Tip-in, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:20PITSidney CrosbyPPGWGAssists: Jake Guentzel, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 18:47MINZach Bogosian: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  2. P2 5:42MINRyan Hartman: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P2 8:05PITKris Letang: Interference2 min
  4. P2 12:18PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 18:52PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 18:52MINAlex Goligoski: Holding2 min
  7. P2 19:25MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Interference2 min
  8. P3 5:45MINKirill Kaprizov: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 7:27PITRadim Zohorna: High sticking double minor4 min
  10. P3 7:27MINRyan Hartman: Interference2 min
  11. P3 12:21MINConnor Dewar: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPIT
27Shots on goal30
2.2Expected goals3.8
62Shot attempts59
24Faceoffs won33
3Power plays5
14Penalty minutes10
17Hits9
12Blocked shots13
5Giveaways10
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy9:46

    xG 0.45–0.22 (67%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  2. Maroon – Foligno – Gaudreau6:01

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Hartman – Rossi8:13

    xG 0.23–0.29 (44%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  4. Maroon – Foligno – Rossi2:17

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Merrill – Hunt11:03

    xG 0.45–0.53 (46%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  2. Goligoski – Bogosian11:16

    xG 0.20–0.28 (42%)attempts 14–5goals 0–2

  3. Middleton – Faber15:18

    xG 0.24–0.50 (32%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Harkins – Acciari7:48

    xG 0.48–0.19 (71%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Smith – Puustinen7:54

    xG 0.40–0.23 (63%)attempts 6–12goals 2–1

  3. Crosby – Rakell – Guentzel11:30

    xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 12–10goals 0–2

  4. Eller – O'Connor – Zohorna6:06

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRuhwedel – Ludvig5:33

    xG 0.48–0.04 (92%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Pettersson15:55

    xG 0.68–0.56 (55%)attempts 17–16goals 2–1

  3. Karlsson – Graves15:19

    xG 0.16–0.33 (32%)attempts 6–18goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGMIN 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #225 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.67 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).