Sat, Dec 30, 2023·KeyBank Center, Buffalo
Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 81% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 17 | 16 | 07 | 00 | 220 |
| BUF | 013 | 115 | 112 | 12 | 342 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 19:47CBJDamon SeversonAssists: Dmitri Voronkov, Egor Chinakhov · Snap, 0.21 xG1–0
- P2 0:40BUFJack QuinnAssists: Dylan Cozens, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–1
- P2 13:45CBJAdam FantilliAssists: Justin Danforth, Cole Sillinger · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
- P3 11:52BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Zach Benson, Mattias Samuelsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
- OT 1:20BUFJeff SkinnerGWGAssists: Owen Power, Tage Thompson · Slap, 0.27 xG2–3
Penalties (2)
- P2 11:38CBJAdam Fantilli: Hooking2 min
- P2 14:33BUFPeyton Krebs: Boarding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Voronkov
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- Gaunce – Roslovic – Texier9:31
xG 0.27–0.34 (44%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1
- Gaudreau – Danforth – Fantilli11:52
xG 0.18–0.49 (27%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0
- Marchenko – Voronkov – Chinakhov11:32
xG 0.66–1.04 (39%)attempts 13–16goals 1–1
- Bemstrom – Johnson – Sillinger11:00
xG 0.05–0.85 (6%)attempts 4–19goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Severson – Provorov16:29
xG 0.60–0.85 (41%)attempts 14–17goals 1–2
- Gudbranson – Christiansen18:29
xG 0.23–1.03 (18%)attempts 5–30goals 0–0
- Bean – Jiricek15:06
xG 0.18–1.13 (14%)attempts 6–28goals 0–0
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka14:40
xG 1.21–0.24 (84%)attempts 20–7goals 1–0
- Skinner – Tuch – Thompson13:20
xG 0.91–0.18 (84%)attempts 27–6goals 0–0
- Greenway – Mittelstadt – Benson12:21
xG 0.48–0.08 (86%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0
- Okposo – Robinson – Krebs7:12
xG 0.06–0.18 (26%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJokiharju – Power16:16
xG 0.91–0.37 (71%)attempts 24–11goals 1–0
- Samuelsson – Dahlin17:33
xG 0.97–0.49 (67%)attempts 25–10goals 1–1
- Clifton – Johnson10:43
xG 0.29–0.19 (61%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 81% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BUF − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).