Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 31, 2023·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Calgary Flames 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI18011212331
CGY011110312433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:44PHIRasmus RistolainenAssists: Ryan Poehling, Joel Farabee · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 18:21CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Andrew Mangiapane, Dennis Gilbert · Snap, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P3 7:29CGYDennis GilbertAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Blake Coleman · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 14:29CGYNazem KadriAssists: Andrew Mangiapane · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:36PHIBobby BrinkAssists: Cam Atkinson, Travis Konecny · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:42CGYBlake ColemanENGWGAssists: Andrew Mangiapane · Wrist, 0.78 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:38PHIEgor ZamulaAssists: Travis Konecny, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:07CGYAndrew Mangiapane: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 1:50CGYMartin Pospisil: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 2:48PHIEgor Zamula: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:36CGYBlake Coleman: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 12:54PHISamuel Ersson: Delaying game equipment2 min
  6. P3 14:19CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICGY
31Shots on goal33
3.0Expected goals3.6
64Shot attempts63
34Faceoffs won25
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
22Hits16
15Blocked shots20
5Giveaways18
9Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Konecny – Foerster3:33

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Atkinson – Frost – Foerster7:30

    xG 0.58–0.50 (54%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Laughton – Hathaway – Tippett2:00

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Deslauriers – Laughton – Hathaway5:37

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRistolainen – Zamula10:49

    xG 0.62–0.55 (53%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim2:22

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Seeler – Walker12:14

    xG 0.21–0.65 (24%)attempts 6–14goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Mangiapane12:13

    xG 0.81–0.28 (74%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  2. Huberdeau – Lindholm – Sharangovich11:45

    xG 0.66–0.56 (54%)attempts 19–8goals 0–1

  3. Greer – Dube – Ruzicka6:03

    xG 0.08–0.02 (80%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Pospisil – Zary8:00

    xG 0.28–0.34 (45%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndersson – Gilbert10:55

    xG 0.87–0.40 (68%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  2. Weegar – Oesterle11:52

    xG 0.60–0.35 (63%)attempts 20–8goals 0–0

  3. Tanev – Hanifin13:29

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.6 xGPHI 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #650 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).