Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 31, 2023·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 1, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 97% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS031602111
COL110011212333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:58COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 16:53SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Calen Addison · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 16:31COLValeri NichushkinGWGAssists: Jack Johnson, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:53COLJosh MansonENAssists: Devon Toews, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:55SJSAlexander Barabanov: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:51COLMiles Wood: Interference2 min
  3. P2 2:40SJSAnthony Duclair: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 11:28COLJosh Manson: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 11:28SJSLuke Kunin: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 12:10SJSFabian Zetterlund: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 16:45COLJonathan Drouin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:07SJSCalen Addison: Holding the stick2 min
  9. P3 4:21SJSMikael Granlund: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 16:44SJSAnthony Duclair: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 16:58COLCale Makar: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 18:53SJSTomas Hertl: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
11Shots on goal33
0.8Expected goals4.5
30Shot attempts87
33Faceoffs won27
3Power plays6
24Penalty minutes8
21Hits24
28Blocked shots10
0Giveaways4
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHoffman – Granlund – Zetterlund10:53

    xG 0.35–0.28 (55%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

  2. Duclair – Bailey – Carpenter2:14

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Hertl – Zadina – Eklund4:43

    xG 0.11–0.17 (39%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Bailey – Carpenter – Zadina4:50

    xG 0.07–0.17 (30%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Rutta – Thrun4:02

    xG 0.08–0.06 (59%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Rutta – Emberson3:06

    xG 0.02–0.01 (75%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Emberson – Addison2:02

    xG 0.09–0.07 (53%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMacKinnon – Drouin – Rantanen14:06

    xG 0.96–0.11 (89%)attempts 25–3goals 0–0

  2. Johansen – Wood – Nichushkin8:46

    xG 0.31–0.10 (75%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Cogliano – O'Connor – Meyers9:39

    xG 0.32–0.14 (70%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  4. MacDermid – Olofsson – Kiviranta3:48

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar14:58

    xG 0.85–0.26 (77%)attempts 22–7goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Byram10:40

    xG 0.52–0.17 (75%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  3. Girard – Byram3:43

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.5 xGSJS 0.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #886 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 97% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).