Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 4, 2024·TD Garden, Boston

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Boston Bruins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT41611118635
BOS21128110529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:41BOSBrad MarchandAssists: David Pastrnak, Charlie McAvoy · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:04PITDrew O'ConnorAssists: Kris Letang, Lars Eller · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:17PITRyan GravesAssists: Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P1 6:39BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Morgan Geekie · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P1 7:21PITJake GuentzelAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P1 15:58PITLars EllerAssists: Drew O'Connor, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.13 xG4–2
  7. P2 6:38PITJeff CarterAssists: Kris Letang, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.21 xG5–2
  8. P2 9:51BOSMorgan GeekieAssists: David Pastrnak, Charlie McAvoy · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–3
  9. P2 19:24BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Brandon Carlo, Morgan Geekie · Tip-in, 0.06 xG5–4
  10. P3 3:08BOSBrad MarchandSHAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–5
  11. P3 11:19PITSidney CrosbyPPGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.04 xG6–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 7:52PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 4:36BOSBrandon Carlo: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 13:21PITKris Letang: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 1:38BOSCharlie McAvoy: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 11:12BOSCharlie McAvoy: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBOS
35Shots on goal29
4.3Expected goals2.0
58Shot attempts58
39Faceoffs won21
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
29Hits19
20Blocked shots12
5Giveaways8
13Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rakell – Guentzel12:58

    xG 1.22–0.36 (77%)attempts 14–12goals 2–1

  2. Eller – Puustinen – O'Connor6:09

    xG 0.52–0.21 (72%)attempts 7–4goals 2–1

  3. Carter – Harkins – Acciari8:10

    xG 0.43–0.16 (73%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Smith – Rust10:08

    xG 0.25–0.21 (54%)attempts 7–5goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Joseph14:40

    xG 1.35–0.40 (77%)attempts 15–10goals 1–1

  2. Letang – Pettersson17:22

    xG 0.98–0.55 (64%)attempts 16–18goals 2–3

  3. Ruhwedel – Graves10:02

    xG 0.29–0.04 (88%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestPastrnak – Zacha – Geekie11:43

    xG 0.34–0.23 (60%)attempts 7–8goals 2–0

  2. Steen – Beecher – Merkulov4:17

    xG 0.00–0.45 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Heinen – Frederic8:00

    xG 0.06–0.66 (9%)attempts 2–9goals 0–2

  4. Marchand – Coyle – DeBrusk9:45

    xG 0.19–0.88 (17%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Grzelcyk3:33

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Lindholm – Carlo10:24

    xG 0.49–0.39 (55%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  3. Grzelcyk – Carlo4:04

    xG 0.08–0.27 (22%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 2.0 xGPIT 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #12 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.39 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).