Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 6, 2024·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Minnesota Wild 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN11111011312436
CBJ181101803329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:09CBJCole SillingerAssists: Jake Bean, Adam Boqvist · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:48MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Brock Faber, Joel Eriksson Ek · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:17CBJCole SillingerAssists: Kirill Marchenko · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:15MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Brock Faber · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 14:15CBJCole SillingerPPAssists: Adam Boqvist · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:28MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Ryan Hartman · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:05MINMarco RossiGWGAssists: Matt Boldy, Brock Faber · Slap, 0.09 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 9:26MINMatt Boldy: High sticking double minor4 min
  2. P1 14:43CBJAlexandre Texier: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:46MINJon Merrill: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 2:46CBJMathieu Olivier: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 2:46MINJon Merrill: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 9:16CBJErik Gudbranson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 17:50CBJDmitri Voronkov: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 1:42CBJJake Bean: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 14:09MINJon Merrill: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sillinger won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCBJ
36Shots on goal29
2.3Expected goals2.5
62Shot attempts68
35Faceoffs won32
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
7Hits15
26Blocked shots16
1Giveaways5
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Zuccarello – Boldy – Rossi14:22

    xG 0.30–0.32 (48%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  2. Duhaime – Dewar – Raska4:49

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Maroon – Petan – Gaudreau3:10

    xG 0.00–0.24 (0%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

  4. Johansson – Hartman – Eriksson Ek13:03

    xG 0.50–0.93 (35%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiddleton – Faber17:44

    xG 0.60–0.51 (54%)attempts 16–18goals 0–2

  2. Merrill – Mermis9:47

    xG 0.16–0.21 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Bogosian16:51

    xG 0.43–0.89 (33%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchenko – Chinakhov – Sillinger10:03

    xG 0.87–0.67 (56%)attempts 14–12goals 2–0

  2. Olivier – Texier – Voronkov5:26

    xG 0.05–0.05 (49%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Roslovic – Bemstrom – Johnson8:53

    xG 0.21–0.24 (46%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Danforth – Fantilli14:31

    xG 0.26–0.36 (42%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Bean15:25

    xG 0.38–0.29 (56%)attempts 18–16goals 0–0

  2. Provorov – Jiricek15:13

    xG 0.80–0.81 (50%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

  3. Severson – Boqvist13:41

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.5 xGMIN 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #143 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.50 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).