Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 9, 2024·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Anaheim Ducks 5, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 55% of the time.

NSH winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA31417112533
NSH011014317342

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:12ANARyan StromeAssists: Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:11ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Alex Killorn · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:37ANAMason McTavishPPAssists: Troy Terry, Pavel Mintyukov · Snap, 0.08 xG3–0
  4. P2 3:05ANATroy TerryGWGAssists: Adam Henrique, Urho Vaakanainen · Deflected, 0.05 xG4–0
  5. P3 3:16ANARadko GudasAssists: Jackson LaCombe · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG5–0
  6. P3 9:45NSHAlexandre CarrierSHAssists: Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–1
  7. P3 17:02NSHPhilip TomasinoAssists: Michael McCarron, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
  8. P3 19:15NSHDenis GurianovAssists: Michael McCarron, Juuso Parssinen · Poke, 0.11 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:04ANARyan Strome: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:28ANARoss Johnston: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:28NSHLuke Schenn: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:21NSHFilip Forsberg: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:39ANAMason McTavish: Interference2 min
  6. P3 1:06ANARadko Gudas: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 8:23NSHCody Glass: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 13:44NSHCody Glass: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Henrique won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANANSH
33Shots on goal42
2.9Expected goals3.2
53Shot attempts73
37Faceoffs won35
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
15Hits26
17Blocked shots12
17Giveaways16
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Lundeström – Leason3:27

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Henrique – Strome – Terry9:02

    xG 0.25–0.25 (50%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  3. Killorn – Vatrano – McTavish11:48

    xG 0.38–0.64 (37%)attempts 14–16goals 1–0

  4. Silfverberg – Carrick – Johnston4:27

    xG 0.10–0.44 (19%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Vaakanainen15:54

    xG 0.34–0.14 (72%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Lyubushkin2:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Lyubushkin – Mintyukov10:06

    xG 0.26–0.43 (38%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestNovak – Smith – Evangelista5:36

    xG 0.42–0.11 (80%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. McCarron – Glass – Tomasino6:23

    xG 0.34–0.39 (47%)attempts 7–9goals 0–2

  3. Sissons – Gurianov – Parssinen6:55

    xG 0.07–0.19 (26%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Nyquist – O'Reilly – Forsberg8:32

    xG 0.09–0.35 (21%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchenn – Josi5:45

    xG 0.44–0.14 (76%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – Carrier10:29

    xG 0.36–0.12 (75%)attempts 13–4goals 0–1

  3. Josi – Fabbro7:48

    xG 0.60–0.49 (55%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.2 xGANA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #294 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.56 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 55% of the time.

NSH winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).