Thu, Jan 11, 2024·Capital One Arena, Washington
Seattle Kraken 4, Washington Capitals 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 26 | 19 | 18 | 423 |
| WSH | 011 | 110 | 05 | 126 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:50SEATye KartyeAssists: Jared McCann, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
- P1 18:12SEAAlexander WennbergGWGAssists: Brandon Tanev · Snap, 0.08 xG2–0
- P2 5:47WSHMax PaciorettyAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Trevor van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
- P2 18:20SEAJustin SchultzAssists: Eeli Tolvanen, Oliver Bjorkstrand · Backhand, 0.06 xG3–1
- P3 12:02SEAAdam LarssonAssists: Brandon Tanev, Jaden Schwartz · Backhand, 0.15 xG4–1
Penalties (2)
- P3 7:00SEAWill Borgen: Tripping2 min
- P3 13:50WSHTrevor van Riemsdyk: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Dowd won the faceoff against Beniers
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Seattle Kraken
Forward lines
- bestGourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen13:05
xG 1.09–0.55 (67%)attempts 18–9goals 1–0
- Schwartz – Wennberg – Tanev9:53
xG 0.80–0.32 (72%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0
- Eberle – Tatar – Beniers12:53
xG 0.58–0.40 (59%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0
- Burakovsky – McCann – Kartye9:08
xG 0.36–0.71 (34%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestLarsson – Dunn19:41
xG 1.28–0.74 (63%)attempts 23–22goals 2–0
- Oleksiak – Borgen16:47
xG 0.94–0.84 (53%)attempts 13–22goals 0–0
- Schultz – Dumoulin11:51
xG 0.64–0.65 (50%)attempts 19–8goals 2–1
Washington Capitals
Forward lines
- bestDowd – Aube-Kubel – Malenstyn10:13
xG 0.32–0.24 (56%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1
- Oshie – Kuznetsov – Lapierre6:58
xG 0.27–0.32 (45%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1
- Ovechkin – Pacioretty – Strome12:39
xG 0.97–1.03 (49%)attempts 14–17goals 1–1
- Mantha – McMichael – Protas10:50
xG 0.36–0.61 (37%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJensen – van Riemsdyk12:57
xG 0.61–0.24 (72%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0
- Edmundson – Bear10:24
xG 0.86–0.71 (55%)attempts 18–10goals 0–1
- Carlson – van Riemsdyk4:31
xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (WSH − SEA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).