Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 15, 2024·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Anaheim Ducks 5, Florida Panthers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 80% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA152101912526
FLA21121101001433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:29FLASam BennettPPAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:35FLASam ReinhartSHAssists: Niko Mikkola · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:56ANAAlex KillornAssists: Adam Henrique · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:24ANAAdam HenriqueSHAssists: Frank Vatrano · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:36FLACarter VerhaeghePPAssists: Brandon Montour, Aleksander Barkov · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:49FLASam BennettAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Carter Verhaeghe · Slap, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P2 14:58ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Sam Carrick · Backhand, 0.15 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:45ANATroy TerryAssists: Jackson LaCombe · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:48ANAAlex KillornGWGAssists: Frank Vatrano, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–4
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 6:43ANASam Carrick: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:24FLAOliver Ekman-Larsson: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 4:35ANATroy Terry: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 5:55FLASam Reinhart: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 7:47ANARyan Strome: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:59FLAOliver Ekman-Larsson: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 15:10FLAAnton Lundell: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:58ANAAlex Killorn: Cross checking2 min
  9. P2 17:58FLASam Bennett: Interference2 min
  10. P3 13:27ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 13:27FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 13:27ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 13:27FLASam Bennett: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 17:22FLANiko Mikkola: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  15. P3 17:28ANAAlex Killorn: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAFLA
26Shots on goal33
2.2Expected goals4.3
50Shot attempts76
24Faceoffs won39
5Power plays4
14Penalty minutes16
22Hits17
19Blocked shots11
4Giveaways8
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Terry – Carlsson13:47

    xG 0.50–0.32 (61%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

  2. Silfverberg – Carrick – Johnston5:57

    xG 0.29–0.17 (63%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Henrique – Strome – McGinn2:45

    xG 0.09–0.03 (73%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. McGinn – Vatrano – Lundeström2:33

    xG 0.01–0.03 (18%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – LaCombe14:27

    xG 0.58–0.43 (58%)attempts 13–19goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Lyubushkin12:04

    xG 0.34–0.41 (45%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  3. Vaakanainen – Lindstrom10:33

    xG 0.05–0.72 (6%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk12:38

    xG 0.80–0.07 (92%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Lomberg – Luostarinen – Lundell8:51

    xG 0.19–0.15 (55%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Stenlund – Lockwood – Gadjovich5:31

    xG 0.13–0.24 (36%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  4. Barkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues9:06

    xG 0.35–0.49 (42%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling12:38

    xG 0.42–0.33 (56%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Mahura9:51

    xG 0.48–0.42 (54%)attempts 11–9goals 0–2

  3. Montour – Mikkola16:02

    xG 0.46–0.69 (40%)attempts 16–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.3 xGANA 2.2 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #80 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.32 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 80% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).