Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 16, 2024·United Center, Chicago

San Jose Sharks 1, Chicago Blackhawks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 68% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS09015112021138
CHI150908032225

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:41CHICole GuttmanPPAssists: Ryan Donato, Kevin Korchinski · Between legs, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P3 5:13SJSRyan CarpenterAssists: Justin Bailey, Mike Hoffman · Snap, 0.14 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Philipp Kurashev stopped
  2. 2. SJS Fabian Zetterlund stopped
  3. 3. CHI Ryan Donato stopped
  4. 4. SJS Kevin Labanc scored
  5. 5. CHI Rem Pitlick scored
  6. 6. CHI Lukas Reichel stopped
  7. 7. SJS Mike Hoffman stopped
  8. 8. CHI Jason Dickinson stopped
  9. 9. SJS Luke Kunin stopped
  10. 10. CHI Cole Guttman stopped
  11. 11. SJS William Eklund stopped
  12. 12. CHI Taylor Raddysh stopped
  13. 13. CHI Zachary Sanford stopped
  14. 14. SJS Alexander Barabanov stopped
  15. 15. CHI Boris Katchouk scored
  16. 16. SJS Filip Zadina stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:46SJSAlexander Barabanov: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:51SJSRyan Carpenter: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:46CHIJaycob Megna: Interference2 min
  4. P2 1:28SJSFabian Zetterlund: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:25SJSKyle Burroughs: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 9:25CHICole Guttman: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 9:25SJSKyle Burroughs: Boarding2 min
  8. P2 9:25CHICole Guttman: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 11:59SJSScott Sabourin: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 11:59CHIJarred Tinordi: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 14:43CHIBoris Katchouk: Hooking2 min
  12. OT 0:45SJSMario Ferraro: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dickinson won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCHI
38Shots on goal25
4.2Expected goals3.0
65Shot attempts64
28Faceoffs won27
2Power plays4
20Penalty minutes16
35Hits26
21Blocked shots8
3Giveaways8
3Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Zetterlund – Barabanov8:46

    xG 0.66–0.22 (75%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Kunin – Zetterlund – Barabanov4:00

    xG 0.49–0.20 (71%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Hoffman – Bailey – Carpenter2:55

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  4. Hertl – Zadina – Eklund10:38

    xG 0.49–0.48 (50%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurroughs – Okhotiuk12:16

    xG 1.51–0.56 (73%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Ferraro12:22

    xG 0.72–0.34 (68%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Rutta – Thrun12:34

    xG 0.68–0.35 (66%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. Raddysh – Pitlick – Kurashev13:18

    xG 0.79–0.83 (49%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

  2. Sanford – Donato – Katchouk6:42

    xG 0.16–0.76 (17%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

  3. Entwistle – Guttman – Reichel7:38

    xG 0.05–0.69 (7%)attempts 4–12goals 0–1

  4. Blackwell – Dickinson – Anderson12:20

    xG 0.13–0.87 (13%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Tinordi – Megna10:51

    xG 0.53–0.54 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  2. Tinordi – Korchinski2:01

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Megna – Vlasic5:43

    xG 0.13–0.51 (21%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.0 xGSJS 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 36/100 · #870 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.24 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 68% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).