Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 20, 2024·TD Garden, Boston

Montréal Canadiens 4, Boston Bruins 9

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 82% of the time.

BOS winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL282607421
BOS312214410936

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:18MTLCole CaufieldPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Juraj Slafkovský · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:47BOSBrandon CarloAssists: Trent Frederic, Jakub Lauko · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:00MTLJoel ArmiaAssists: Joshua Roy, Sean Monahan · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:10BOSJake DeBruskAssists: James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P1 19:05BOSDanton HeinenAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Charlie McAvoy · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 6:16MTLMike MathesonPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Nick Suzuki · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P2 10:46BOSDanton HeinenAssists: Jesper Boqvist, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P2 11:35BOSCharlie CoyleGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P2 13:19MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Rafael Harvey-Pinard · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–5
  10. P3 1:26BOSDavid PastrnakUnassisted · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–6
  11. P3 4:32BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–7
  12. P3 9:13BOSPavel ZachaAssists: Jake DeBrusk, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–8
  13. P3 10:40BOSDanton HeinenPPAssists: Morgan Geekie, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.29 xG4–9
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:06MTLMike Matheson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 8:22BOSKevin Shattenkirk: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:10BOSCharlie Coyle: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:55MTLJosh Anderson: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 7:55MTLJosh Anderson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 7:55BOSTrent Frederic: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 18:56BOSMatt Grzelcyk: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 10:10MTLNick Suzuki: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Evans won the faceoff against Zacha
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLBOS
21Shots on goal36
1.9Expected goals3.9
46Shot attempts53
27Faceoffs won28
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
44Hits39
7Blocked shots14
7Giveaways9
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestArmia – Monahan – Roy9:10

    xG 0.43–0.32 (57%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  2. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský13:40

    xG 0.71–0.86 (45%)attempts 13–12goals 0–2

  3. Stephens – Pezzetta – Harvey-Pinard6:26

    xG 0.03–0.35 (9%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Gallagher – Anderson – Evans10:37

    xG 0.04–0.65 (6%)attempts 7–11goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. Matheson – Barron2:10

    xG 0.11–0.06 (65%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Harris – Guhle2:17

    xG 0.01–0.14 (4%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Savard – Matheson11:53

    xG 0.45–0.87 (34%)attempts 6–15goals 0–3

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestFrederic – Geekie – Lauko7:21

    xG 0.18–0.03 (88%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Zacha – DeBrusk6:30

    xG 0.46–0.34 (57%)attempts 5–6goals 2–1

  3. Marchand – Coyle – Pastrnak10:20

    xG 0.52–0.73 (41%)attempts 9–14goals 2–0

  4. Heinen – Boqvist – Poitras7:39

    xG 0.05–0.36 (12%)attempts 3–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Carlo14:10

    xG 1.13–0.46 (71%)attempts 10–12goals 3–0

  2. Lindholm – McAvoy2:53

    xG 0.49–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  3. Grzelcyk – McAvoy16:53

    xG 0.58–0.32 (64%)attempts 14–11goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.9 xGMTL 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #156 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 82% of the time.

BOS winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).