Mon, Jan 22, 2024·TD Garden, Boston
Winnipeg Jets 1, Boston Bruins 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 90% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 16 | 04 | 011 | 121 |
| BOS | 25 | 010 | 26 | 421 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 2:20BOSJakub LaukoAssists: Trent Frederic, Morgan Geekie · Wrist, 0.21 xG0–1
- P1 4:16WPGVladislav NamestnikovAssists: Dylan DeMelo, Nikolaj Ehlers · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
- P1 18:26BOSCharlie CoyleGWGAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Brandon Carlo · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–2
- P3 14:35BOSJake DeBruskSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.19 xG1–3
- P3 19:05BOSBrad MarchandENAssists: Charlie Coyle, David Pastrnak · Wrist, 0.72 xG1–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 10:10BOSHampus Lindholm: Cross checking2 min
- P1 19:54BOSCharlie McAvoy: Slashing2 min
- P2 2:28WPGNino Niederreiter: Tripping2 min
- P2 12:57WPGDylan DeMelo: Boarding2 min
- P3 12:28WPGNino Niederreiter: Tripping2 min
- P3 14:06BOSHampus Lindholm: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Lowry won the faceoff against Zacha
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestToninato – Iafallo – Perfetti3:46
xG 0.20–0.04 (85%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Lowry – Ehlers – Connor2:21
xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Jonsson-Fjallby – Barron – Kupari4:49
xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
- Namestnikov – Ehlers – Connor4:59
xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Schmidt – Samberg9:10
xG 0.43–0.48 (47%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1
- DeMelo – Morrissey18:11
xG 0.32–0.52 (38%)attempts 11–16goals 1–1
- Dillon – Pionk10:56
xG 0.10–0.33 (23%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestFrederic – Geekie – Lauko8:12
xG 0.30–0.04 (89%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0
- van Riemsdyk – Zacha – DeBrusk8:35
xG 0.28–0.04 (88%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
- Marchand – Coyle – Pastrnak10:44
xG 0.33–0.21 (62%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1
- Heinen – Boqvist – Poitras6:38
xG 0.05–0.22 (19%)attempts 1–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestLindholm – Carlo12:48
xG 0.55–0.14 (79%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0
- Forbort – Wotherspoon11:56
xG 0.72–0.34 (68%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1
- Grzelcyk – Carlo2:32
xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 90% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − WPG), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).