Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 23, 2024·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Washington Capitals 3, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH09112212333
MIN2811428530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:37MINBrock FaberAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Marco Rossi · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:42MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:28MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:00WSHAnthony ManthaAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, Martin Fehérváry · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:37MINJoel Eriksson EkGWGAssists: Marcus Foligno, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 13:39MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Ryan Hartman, Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.12 xG1–5
  7. P3 17:03WSHT.J. OshiePPAssists: John Carlson, Max Pacioretty · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:24WSHAnthony ManthaAssists: Beck Malenstyn, Nic Dowd · Backhand, 0.16 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:41MINMarco Rossi: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 15:45WSHTrevor van Riemsdyk: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 18:58MINJonas Brodin: Interference2 min
  4. P2 15:02WSHNic Dowd: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 6:04MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 15:06MINMarco Rossi: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dowd won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHMIN
33Shots on goal30
2.3Expected goals2.8
58Shot attempts54
29Faceoffs won29
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
16Hits16
13Blocked shots11
4Giveaways5
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestPacioretty – Strome – Protas3:53

    xG 0.27–0.12 (69%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Kuznetsov – Wilson – Mantha8:52

    xG 0.45–0.31 (60%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  3. Ovechkin – McMichael – Protas3:38

    xG 0.08–0.25 (24%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  4. Ovechkin – Oshie – McMichael3:27

    xG 0.01–0.20 (6%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJensen – Edmundson11:54

    xG 0.84–0.11 (88%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Sandin12:29

    xG 0.31–0.89 (26%)attempts 11–16goals 0–2

  3. Carlson – Fehérváry15:46

    xG 0.25–1.07 (19%)attempts 12–19goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Eriksson Ek – Boldy10:23

    xG 0.86–0.26 (77%)attempts 16–6goals 2–0

  2. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi12:24

    xG 0.33–0.20 (62%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  3. Maroon – Johansson – Hartman10:38

    xG 0.56–0.56 (50%)attempts 9–10goals 1–1

  4. Gaudreau – Duhaime – Lucchini4:57

    xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMermis – Middleton13:08

    xG 0.76–0.43 (64%)attempts 14–8goals 2–0

  2. Brodin – Faber16:16

    xG 0.41–0.32 (56%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Goligoski – Bogosian12:08

    xG 0.80–0.78 (51%)attempts 12–15goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.8 xGWSH 2.3 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #490 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).