Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 24, 2024·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Buffalo Sabres 5, Los Angeles Kings 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF113211213537
LAK313013014340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:55LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Adrian Kempe, Matt Roy · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:01BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:24LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Drew Doughty, Quinton Byfield · Snap, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P1 9:44LAKPierre-Luc DuboisPPAssists: Alex Laferriere, Brandt Clarke · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:22BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Jack Quinn · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:30BUFJack QuinnAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Ryan Johnson · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:49BUFAlex TuchGWGAssists: Eric Robinson, Peyton Krebs · Snap, 0.18 xG4–3
  8. P3 8:54BUFDylan CozensAssists: JJ Peterka, Jack Quinn · Wrist, 0.05 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:51BUFTage Thompson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:19BUFJeff Skinner: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 14:02LAKTrevor Lewis: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 11:30LAKPierre-Luc Dubois: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 17:44LAKMatt Roy: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 15:08LAKAdrian Kempe: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 19:11BUFTage Thompson: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Mittelstadt
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFLAK
37Shots on goal40
2.7Expected goals3.4
71Shot attempts70
26Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
16Hits26
13Blocked shots23
7Giveaways9
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka6:51

    xG 0.44–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–5goals 3–0

  2. Tuch – Robinson – Krebs3:47

    xG 0.23–0.18 (55%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Tuch – Greenway – Mittelstadt7:56

    xG 0.31–0.58 (35%)attempts 6–13goals 0–2

  4. Okposo – Skinner – Thompson9:32

    xG 0.29–0.77 (27%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Johnson11:42

    xG 0.50–0.38 (57%)attempts 12–16goals 1–0

  2. Jokiharju – Dahlin2:38

    xG 0.19–0.16 (55%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Power10:29

    xG 0.50–0.53 (49%)attempts 13–9goals 2–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – Kempe – Byfield11:58

    xG 1.01–0.43 (70%)attempts 19–15goals 2–0

  2. Lewis – Grundstrom – Fagemo7:12

    xG 0.23–0.07 (77%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Dubois – Anderson-Dolan – Laferriere6:58

    xG 0.45–0.36 (56%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  4. Danault – Fiala – Moore11:07

    xG 0.47–0.52 (48%)attempts 10–13goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Anderson14:34

    xG 0.87–0.46 (66%)attempts 20–18goals 1–2

  2. Englund – Clarke9:59

    xG 0.56–0.26 (68%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Gavrikov – Roy15:29

    xG 0.97–0.99 (50%)attempts 25–19goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.4 xGBUF 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #283 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.82 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).