Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 27, 2024·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Buffalo Sabres 5, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 79% of the time.

SJS winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF210113213536
SJS2120707226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:06SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: William Eklund, Ty Emberson · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:42SJSJan RuttaAssists: William Eklund · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:14BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:01BUFJordan GreenwayAssists: Alex Tuch, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:36BUFAlex TuchGWGAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:33BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens, Jack Quinn · Slap, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:44BUFDylan CozensENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.63 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:33SJSMike Hoffman: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 7:13SJSLogan Couture: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 16:43BUFHenri Jokiharju: Interference2 min
  4. P3 9:54BUFKyle Okposo: Interference2 min
  5. P3 9:54SJSKyle Burroughs: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 9:54BUFKyle Okposo: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 9:54SJSLuke Kunin: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 9:54BUFJeff Skinner: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 14:56BUFConnor Clifton: Interference2 min
  10. P3 14:56SJSWilliam Eklund: Embellishment2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFSJS
36Shots on goal26
4.3Expected goals2.3
65Shot attempts65
31Faceoffs won38
2Power plays2
10Penalty minutes10
14Hits14
17Blocked shots12
6Giveaways5
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Greenway – Mittelstadt10:04

    xG 0.80–0.20 (80%)attempts 11–12goals 2–0

  2. Cozens – Quinn – Peterka7:19

    xG 0.60–0.19 (76%)attempts 13–13goals 2–2

  3. Robinson – Krebs – Benson11:04

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – Skinner – Thompson11:27

    xG 0.53–0.75 (41%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Power13:00

    xG 0.68–0.31 (68%)attempts 16–14goals 2–0

  2. Bryson – Dahlin13:17

    xG 0.93–0.59 (61%)attempts 14–17goals 0–1

  3. Dahlin – Power3:04

    xG 0.17–0.02 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHoffman – Hertl – Zetterlund10:53

    xG 0.53–0.39 (58%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  2. Bailey – Carpenter – Zadina6:10

    xG 0.15–0.31 (33%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  3. Kunin – Sturm – Eklund5:49

    xG 0.17–0.45 (27%)attempts 9–7goals 2–1

  4. Couture – Duclair – Barabanov9:57

    xG 0.19–0.70 (21%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Vlasic – Emberson13:34

    xG 0.56–0.55 (51%)attempts 16–16goals 1–0

  2. Emberson – Mukhamadullin2:23

    xG 0.11–0.16 (42%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Rutta – Mukhamadullin15:09

    xG 0.42–0.90 (32%)attempts 21–19goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.3 xGBUF 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #462 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.34 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 79% of the time.

SJS winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).