Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 12, 2024·T-Mobile Arena, Paradise

Minnesota Wild 5, Vegas Golden Knights 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 72% of the time.

VGK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN21404311529
VGK26014110330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:22VGKJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Nicolas Roy, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:48MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:09MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Matt Boldy, Kirill Kaprizov · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:45VGKMichael AmadioPPAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Brendan Brisson · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:28MINMarco RossiAssists: Matt Boldy, Brock Faber · Poke, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:29MINMatt BoldyGWGAssists: Ryan Hartman, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 9:40VGKMark StoneAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Zach Whitecloud · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:38MINJoel Eriksson EkENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.76 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:09VGKSheldon Rempal: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:51VGKKeegan Kolesar: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  3. P1 9:49VGKBrayden McNabb: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:21MINDakota Mermis: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 3:18MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 7:35MINBrandon Duhaime: Interference2 min
  7. P2 16:40MINMarcus Johansson: Interference2 min
  8. P3 3:05MINJon Merrill: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VGK
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackVGK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Roy
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINVGK
29Shots on goal30
3.7Expected goals2.4
64Shot attempts54
34Faceoffs won25
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
22Hits19
11Blocked shots19
4Giveaways4
9Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy9:48

    xG 0.79–0.17 (82%)attempts 17–5goals 1–1

  2. Johansson – Zuccarello – Rossi8:34

    xG 0.58–0.06 (91%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. Lettieri – Dewar – Lucchini5:13

    xG 0.00–0.11 (4%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Hartman – Gaudreau – Duhaime5:43

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMerrill – Mermis12:26

    xG 0.71–0.13 (85%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Brodin – Faber3:36

    xG 0.34–0.02 (96%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Bogosian – Brodin11:47

    xG 0.50–0.29 (63%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestKarlsson – Rempal – Brisson7:14

    xG 0.25–0.10 (72%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Kolesar – Howden – Rondbjerg6:35

    xG 0.15–0.30 (33%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Marchessault – Barbashev – Roy9:37

    xG 0.12–0.51 (19%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

  4. Stone – Stephenson – Amadio10:35

    xG 0.17–0.84 (17%)attempts 6–16goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Hague – Whitecloud13:50

    xG 0.31–0.55 (36%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. McNabb – Miromanov12:59

    xG 0.17–0.60 (23%)attempts 10–17goals 0–1

  3. Martinez – Pietrangelo13:41

    xG 0.27–0.75 (26%)attempts 7–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VGK 2.4 xGMIN 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VGKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VGK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VGK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #323 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.95 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50VGK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 72% of the time.

VGK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (VGK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).