Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 15, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

San Jose Sharks 6, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 69% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS08310313631
CGY11319112334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:19CGYNazem KadriAssists: Martin Pospisil · Deflected, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:52SJSMikael GranlundAssists: Filip Zadina · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:50SJSJustin BaileyAssists: Filip Zadina · Snap, 0.35 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:30SJSLuke KuninPPAssists: William Eklund, Kyle Burroughs · Snap, 0.21 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:40CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Chris Tanev, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:38SJSFilip ZadinaGWGAssists: Nico Sturm, Justin Bailey · Tip-in, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 5:15SJSFilip ZadinaAssists: Justin Bailey, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.05 xG5–2
  8. P3 15:30SJSLuke KuninUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG6–2
  9. P3 16:40CGYAndrei KuzmenkoAssists: Chris Tanev, Jonathan Huberdeau · Tip-in, 0.12 xG6–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:38SJSMike Hoffman: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:57SJSTy Emberson: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 1:23SJSAlexander Barabanov: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:20SJSJan Rutta: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 10:36CGYBlake Coleman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:34CGYBlake Coleman: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 19:40SJSFilip Zadina: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  8. P3 2:10CGYWalker Duehr: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 10:34CGYMartin Pospisil: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 10:34SJSLuke Kunin: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 0:00CGYBlake Coleman: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCGY
31Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals3.9
59Shot attempts79
29Faceoffs won33
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
14Hits21
18Blocked shots17
5Giveaways15
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestKunin – Barabanov – Eklund10:31

    xG 0.64–0.45 (59%)attempts 16–14goals 1–1

  2. Granlund – Duclair – Zetterlund9:16

    xG 0.26–0.39 (39%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  3. Bailey – Carpenter – Zadina5:56

    xG 0.07–0.22 (25%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Rutta10:56

    xG 0.52–0.26 (66%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Vlasic – Emberson9:03

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  3. Burroughs – Addison10:56

    xG 0.37–0.77 (33%)attempts 12–21goals 1–2

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Sharangovich – Kuzmenko7:34

    xG 0.73–0.26 (74%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  2. Rooney – Schwindt – Duehr6:51

    xG 0.32–0.23 (58%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Pospisil – Zary10:04

    xG 0.67–0.66 (50%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1

  4. Backlund – Coleman – Mangiapane10:12

    xG 0.31–0.39 (44%)attempts 13–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Hanifin14:14

    xG 1.26–0.36 (78%)attempts 27–14goals 2–1

  2. Kylington – Pachal12:32

    xG 0.61–0.72 (46%)attempts 10–20goals 1–1

  3. Weegar – Andersson12:47

    xG 0.24–0.74 (24%)attempts 10–17goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.9 xGSJS 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #438 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 69% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).