Thu, Feb 15, 2024·Rogers Arena, Vancouver
Detroit Red Wings 1, Vancouver Canucks 4
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 03 | 110 | 015 | 128 |
| VAN | 26 | 110 | 15 | 421 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 7:37VANJ.T. MillerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
- P1 9:31VANElias LindholmGWGAssists: Elias Pettersson · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
- P2 12:51VANNikita ZadorovAssists: Elias Pettersson, Nils Hoglander · Snap, 0.00 xG0–3
- P2 14:25DETJ.T. CompherAssists: Patrick Kane, Christian Fischer · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
- P3 12:59VANElias LindholmAssists: Elias Pettersson · Snap, 0.20 xG1–4
Penalties (8)
- P1 1:26VANPius Suter: Tripping2 min
- P1 12:06VANIan Cole: Tripping2 min
- P1 18:52VANNikita Zadorov: Interference2 min
- P2 2:27DETJeff Petry: High sticking double minor4 min
- P3 0:16VANQuinn Hughes: Slashing2 min
- P3 5:14VANTeddy Blueger: Tripping2 min
- P3 15:24VANPius Suter: Slashing2 min
- P3 15:24DETJake Walman: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Blueger won the faceoff against Copp
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestLarkin – Sprong – Raymond5:13
xG 0.44–0.28 (61%)attempts 8–5goals 0–2
- Copp – Fischer – Rasmussen5:09
xG 0.09–0.02 (79%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0
- Kane – Compher – DeBrincat7:31
xG 0.34–0.32 (51%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0
- Perron – Kane – Compher2:13
xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- Maatta – Gostisbehere9:35
xG 0.38–0.35 (53%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
- Petry – Chiarot13:10
xG 0.39–0.38 (51%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1
- Gostisbehere – Seider2:18
xG 0.12–0.23 (35%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestLindholm – Pettersson – Hoglander8:04
xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 15–6goals 3–0
- Blueger – Garland – Mikheyev7:32
xG 0.46–0.30 (61%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1
- Miller – Boeser – Suter9:47
xG 0.31–0.25 (55%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0
- Di Giuseppe – Lafferty – Aman5:46
xG 0.00–0.24 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestZadorov – Juulsen10:24
xG 0.55–0.20 (73%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0
- Myers – Hughes2:25
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0
- Hronek – Hughes12:22
xG 0.63–0.71 (47%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VAN − DET), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).