Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 24, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Minnesota Wild 5, Seattle Kraken 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

SEA winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN21039012531
SEA19012111232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:36SEAVince DunnAssists: Jared McCann, Matty Beniers · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:59MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Jake Middleton · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:32MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:09MINMatt BoldyPPGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Backhand, 0.15 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:14MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–1
  6. P2 6:58MINDakota MermisAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Connor Dewar · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–1
  7. P3 6:11SEAJordan EberleAssists: Adam Larsson · Backhand, 0.01 xG5–2
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 12:38SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:07SEAJamie Oleksiak: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 16:40MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 19:22SEAAdam Larsson: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 1:58MINBrandon Duhaime: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 1:58SEAVince Dunn: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 4:45MINMats Zuccarello: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 14:03MINJon Merrill: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  9. P2 17:28SEAYanni Gourde: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 17:28MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 18:10SEAVince Dunn: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 6:34MINJoel Eriksson Ek: High sticking2 min
  13. P3 12:44SEAAdam Larsson: High sticking double minor4 min
  14. P3 15:18MINMats Zuccarello: Tripping2 min
  15. P3 19:36SEAWill Borgen: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 19:36MINBrandon Duhaime: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSEA
31Shots on goal32
3.8Expected goals3.2
58Shot attempts75
33Faceoffs won31
6Power plays5
19Penalty minutes21
9Hits27
22Blocked shots11
2Giveaways3
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestLettieri – Lucchini – Rossi7:30

    xG 0.66–0.15 (81%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  2. Gaudreau – Duhaime – Dewar5:02

    xG 0.30–0.16 (66%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy9:32

    xG 0.10–0.33 (23%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

  4. Johansson – Zuccarello – Hartman9:20

    xG 0.22–0.66 (25%)attempts 7–14goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Chisholm15:10

    xG 1.14–0.83 (58%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

  2. Merrill – Mermis7:54

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 7–9goals 1–1

  3. Middleton – Faber10:26

    xG 0.02–0.37 (6%)attempts 2–17goals 0–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Burakovsky – Wennberg6:37

    xG 0.68–0.04 (95%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Tatar – Gourde – Tanev3:20

    xG 0.10–0.05 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Gourde – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen5:47

    xG 0.05–0.01 (77%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Eberle – Tatar – Beniers2:09

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Dumoulin10:27

    xG 0.28–0.02 (93%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn11:59

    xG 0.20–0.41 (33%)attempts 14–11goals 2–0

  3. Oleksiak – Borgen7:00

    xG 0.47–0.79 (37%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.2 xGMIN 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #801 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

SEA winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).