Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 25, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Pittsburgh Penguins 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI173925621
PIT211210311732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:11PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Olle Lycksell, Travis Sanheim · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:38PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Bryan Rust, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:15PITBryan RustAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 0:55PHITyson FoersterAssists: Owen Tippett, Sean Walker · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:15PITBryan RustPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:38PITEmil BemstromPPAssists: Reilly Smith, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:33PHITravis SanheimAssists: Sean Couturier · Slap, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:36PHIScott LaughtonSHAssists: Noah Cates, Cam York · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–4
  9. P3 6:41PITDrew O'ConnorAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Valtteri Puustinen · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–5
  10. P3 8:38PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby, Marcus Pettersson · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–6
  11. P3 10:10PHICam YorkAssists: Olle Lycksell, Tyson Foerster · Snap, 0.08 xG5–6
  12. P3 15:13PITKris LetangGWGUnassisted · Slap, 0.06 xG5–7
  13. P3 17:57PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Sean Couturier, Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.09 xG6–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 1:52PITLars Eller: High sticking double minor4 min
  2. P2 4:14PHIMorgan Frost: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 10:12PHITravis Sanheim: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 11:54PHINicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:48PHITravis Sanheim: Interference2 min
  6. P3 3:26PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 10:32PITRickard Rakell: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 17:30PITSidney Crosby: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Poehling
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
21Shots on goal32
1.9Expected goals3.5
56Shot attempts71
33Faceoffs won30
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
24Hits23
24Blocked shots18
3Giveaways8
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHathaway – Poehling – Cates7:53

    xG 0.36–0.14 (72%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  2. Deslauriers – Laughton – Lycksell3:20

    xG 0.19–0.10 (65%)attempts 3–8goals 1–0

  3. Laughton – Tippett – Foerster7:11

    xG 0.31–0.27 (54%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  4. Frost – Lycksell – Farabee3:43

    xG 0.01–0.08 (7%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaal – Sanheim2:27

    xG 0.13–0.03 (83%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – York12:19

    xG 0.36–0.34 (52%)attempts 11–16goals 2–0

  3. Seeler – Walker12:40

    xG 0.47–0.92 (34%)attempts 12–16goals 1–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Puustinen – O'Connor9:55

    xG 0.78–0.15 (84%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Rakell8:38

    xG 0.68–0.25 (73%)attempts 15–9goals 2–1

  3. Eller – Smith – Bemstrom7:27

    xG 0.23–0.19 (55%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  4. Carter – Harkins – Acciari8:17

    xG 0.12–0.35 (25%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRuhwedel – Graves8:51

    xG 0.68–0.28 (71%)attempts 11–12goals 0–2

  2. Karlsson – Pettersson17:05

    xG 0.65–0.37 (63%)attempts 18–16goals 2–1

  3. Letang – Joseph10:32

    xG 0.49–0.44 (52%)attempts 18–5goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.5 xGPHI 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #17 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.68 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).