Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 26, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Boston Bruins 3, Seattle Kraken 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 68% of the time.

SEA winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BOS11111019020332
SEA0715214011427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:53BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Jesper Boqvist · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:45SEAJordan EberlePPUnassisted · Backhand, 0.31 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:08BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Pavel Zacha, Charlie McAvoy · Snap, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:29SEAVince DunnAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Yanni Gourde · Snap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 14:30SEAOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Will Borgen, Alexander Wennberg · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:08BOSCharlie CoylePPAssists: David Pastrnak, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. SEA Kailer Yamamoto scored
  2. 2. BOS Charlie Coyle stopped
  3. 3. SEA Tomas Tatar stopped
  4. 4. SEA Matty Beniers stopped
  5. 5. BOS David Pastrnak stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 3:03BOSJustin Brazeau: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 7:13BOSBrandon Carlo: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 8:50BOSJames van Riemsdyk: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P3 8:28BOSMorgan Geekie: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 15:15SEAJordan Eberle: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 17:33BOSDanton Heinen: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Geekie won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSSEA
32Shots on goal27
3.7Expected goals2.5
60Shot attempts68
35Faceoffs won23
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
9Hits19
21Blocked shots16
6Giveaways6
8Takeaways18

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestPastrnak – Zacha – DeBrusk5:29

    xG 0.50–0.07 (88%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Heinen – Frederic – Geekie10:28

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Zacha – DeBrusk2:14

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Marchand – Coyle – Pastrnak4:20

    xG 0.44–0.39 (53%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Wotherspoon10:47

    xG 1.07–0.27 (80%)attempts 19–9goals 1–0

  2. Grzelcyk – McAvoy13:37

    xG 0.84–0.32 (73%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  3. Wotherspoon – McAvoy2:38

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg12:23

    xG 0.76–0.46 (62%)attempts 18–12goals 1–1

  2. Tatar – Gourde – Tanev3:02

    xG 0.00–0.22 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Tatar – Tanev – Yamamoto5:59

    xG 0.04–0.29 (13%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – Burakovsky – Tolvanen9:16

    xG 0.26–0.70 (27%)attempts 14–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Dumoulin11:23

    xG 0.14–0.50 (22%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  2. Oleksiak – Borgen11:46

    xG 0.48–0.85 (36%)attempts 14–13goals 1–2

  3. Larsson – Dunn17:08

    xG 0.29–1.12 (20%)attempts 14–19goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.5 xGBOS 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEABOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #90 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.91 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 68% of the time.

SEA winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).